Re: [flexcoders] recompiling framework shared library?

2009-01-10 Thread Sam Lai
Could you subclass that class and make the changes there? That way you don't need to change the Flex class, and hence the RSL. 2009/1/10 luvfotography ygro...@all-digital-links.com: Hi, I've made a change to mx.controls.videoClasses.VideoPlayer.as and placed it in my 'src' folder under the

Re: [flexcoders] recompiling framework shared library?

2009-01-10 Thread Doug McCune
yup, that would work just fine On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Sam Lai samuel@gmail.com wrote: Could you subclass that class and make the changes there? That way you don't need to change the Flex class, and hence the RSL. 2009/1/10 luvfotography

Re: [flexcoders] recompiling framework shared library?

2009-01-10 Thread Doug McCune
oh, ha, I thought that was the original poster asking that. My bad. On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Doug McCune d...@dougmccune.com wrote: yup, that would work just fine On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Sam Lai samuel@gmail.com wrote: Could you subclass that class and make the

Re: [flexcoders] recompiling framework shared library?

2009-01-09 Thread Steve Mathews
The swz are signed files that only Adobe can compile. On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:45 AM, luvfotography ygro...@all-digital-links.com wrote: Hi, I've made a change to mx.controls.videoClasses.VideoPlayer.as and placed it in my 'src' folder under the folders 'mx', then 'controls', then

Re: [flexcoders] recompiling framework shared library?

2009-01-09 Thread Doug McCune
yeah, one of the downsides of using the signed rsl is that you can't easily monkey patch. I'm not sure what happens if you try to load your code in a different RSL AFTER the framework RSL has been loaded... But in general if you want to use the cached framework RSL you're committed to using the