Description:
We are creating a web-app built with Flex 2.
This app uses some very large image files (From around 256K to over
600K)
We have an image viewer section of our Flex app that will allow the
user to move from one image to another.
I was noticing that with our app in IE7 that memory
I might agree with that, but in Firefox this is not an issue. Firefox
releases memory on a regular basis while IE7 does not seem to release
until I exceed the physical memory on the machine.
BTW: I posted the wrong sizes in my original email. The images we are
dealing with are 256Meg to 600Meg
This site seems to be pretty good:
http://www.brucephillips.name/blog/index.cfm/2007/1/8/Example-Of-
Using-Modules-In-Flex-201
But I am still missing something. It seems that my modules are loaded
even if I don't explisitly load them.
Here is my test app:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
Collin,
We are using a similar approach for our I18N strings. We don't have
nearly as many strings are you have indicated you are using, but we
are wondering the same thing. Will a large number of data bound
string cause problems in the app?
We are trying to come up with a different plan if
I would like to make a request for an upgrade to AS4 and I'm not sure
where to send it. So here it is. If there is a better place, please
let me know.
Currently if I want to create properties I have to do this:
public function get useStringCache() : Boolean
{
return _useStringCache;
}
, is
this supported ECMAScript syntax? Is it supported in any
language? ( I
actually don't know ).
At 03:36 PM 3/29/2007, One Person wrote:
I would like to make a request for an upgrade to AS4 and I'm not
sure
where to send it. So here it is. If there is a better place,
please
let me know
Starting on line 197 of SliderEvent.as there is a constructor for the
SliderEvent object.
This constructor takes the following parameters:
type:String,
bubbles:Boolean = false,
cancelable:Boolean = false,
thumbIndex:int = -1,
value:Number = NaN,
triggerEvent:Event = null,
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of One Person
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:06 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Using old (2.01) History Manager in Flex 3.x
Is there any way
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your main goal is to not have information added to the url?
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of One Person
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:24 AM
As stated before I don't have time before my release to make the change
to get things to work with the new Flex 3 way of doing things.
That is why I posted in the first place. I am just trying to find if
anyone have come up with a way to use the old way of doing things
instead of forcing me to
10 matches
Mail list logo
