[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

Humorous that you say PureMVC ( 21 classes )is on the heavy side, instead suggesting Nimbus ( 24 classes ) as an alternative. -=Cliff --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Hardy aaronius...@... wrote: I'd consider those still being on the heavy side. One we use is called Nimbus and can

[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

PS, PureMVC is only 21 classes because there are 11 interfaces, corresponding to their implementations. There are only 11 actual classes in PureMVC. Get back to me when you get your scales fixed :) -=Cliff --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Cliff Hall cl...@... wrote: Humorous that you say

[flexcoders] Re: Dynamically binding a dataprovider in AS

Sean, Don't overlook the obvious. You may simply do this: bb.dataprovider = vs; -=Cliff --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Roman Protsiuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mx.binding.utils.BindingUtils.bindProperty(bb, dataProvider, this, vs); R. On 6/8/07, zzwi89 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[flexcoders] Re: Flex Component kit

Patrick, You must define the XML namespace on the Application itself: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? mx:Application layout=vertical xmlns:mx=http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml; xmlns:ng=* ng:NewGlobe/ /mx:Application --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, {reduxdj} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: