from:"Rob Dickey"

[flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

2006-01-17 Thread Rob Dickey

Sanity Check needed :)

I have a scenario where I need to destroy and recreate all child objects of
a view stack.

I'm first using the viewStack.destroyAllChildren() (or
viewStack.destroyChildAt(index)) which destroy the child objects as
expected, but when I attempt to re-create using the viewStack.createChild()
I run into some unexpected results.  It appears from debugging, etc. that
the new child objects appear ok structurally but the layout and some of the
initialization has not been completed. The creation policy of the view stack
and child objects are not explicitly stated so the default is being used. 

So am I doing this correctly? Is there another / better way to
destroy/recreate child objects dynamically?

Thanks for any info.

Regards,
Rob



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

2006-01-17 Thread Rob Dickey

I believe that is the issue...after sending the email I realized that I am
not waiting for the creationComplete event to be dispatched on each child
before attempting to use the child. 

Thanks for the response. 

Rob


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gordon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:51 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

The layout and some of the initialization has not been completed

Completed by when? The LayoutManager runs asynchronously. When
createChild() returns, the new child won't exist, but its
commitProperties(), measure(), and updateDisplayList() methods won't
have been called yet. By the time the new child dispatches its
creationComplete event, they should all have been called.

Other than this timing issue, how is createChild() failing?

- Gordon

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Dickey
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

Sanity Check needed :)

I have a scenario where I need to destroy and recreate all child objects
of
a view stack.

I'm first using the viewStack.destroyAllChildren() (or
viewStack.destroyChildAt(index)) which destroy the child objects as
expected, but when I attempt to re-create using the
viewStack.createChild()
I run into some unexpected results.  It appears from debugging, etc.
that
the new child objects appear ok structurally but the layout and some of
the
initialization has not been completed. The creation policy of the view
stack
and child objects are not explicitly stated so the default is being
used. 

So am I doing this correctly? Is there another / better way to
destroy/recreate child objects dynamically?

Thanks for any info.

Regards,
Rob



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links








--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 


SPONSORED LINKS 
Web site design development 
Computer software development 
Software design and development 
Macromedia flex 
Software development best practice 



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

  Visit your group flexcoders on the web.
  
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

2006-01-17 Thread Rob Dickey











I verified that the component I am
creating does have the creationComplete event defined but it is not firingshould
I be listening for the childCreated event on the view stack instead? 



Thanks again for the info and assist











From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006
10:51 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders]
Destroying/Re-creating Objects





The layout and some of
the initialization has not been completed

Completed by when? The LayoutManager runs
asynchronously. When
createChild() returns, the new child won't exist,
but its
commitProperties(), measure(), and
updateDisplayList() methods won't
have been called yet. By the time the new child
dispatches its
creationComplete event, they should all have been
called.

Other than this timing issue, how is createChild()
failing?

- Gordon

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com]
On
Behalf Of Rob Dickey
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating
Objects

Sanity Check needed :)

I have a scenario where I need to destroy and
recreate all child objects
of
a view stack.

I'm first using the viewStack.destroyAllChildren()
(or
viewStack.destroyChildAt(index)) which destroy the
child objects as
expected, but when I attempt to re-create using
the
viewStack.createChild()
I run into some unexpected results. It
appears from debugging, etc.
that
the new child objects appear ok structurally but
the layout and some of
the
initialization has not been completed. The
creation policy of the view
stack
and child objects are not explicitly stated so the
default is being
used. 

So am I doing this correctly? Is there another /
better way to
destroy/recreate child objects dynamically?

Thanks for any info.

Regards,
Rob



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links














--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

RE: [flexcoders] CheckCellRenderer

2005-12-29 Thread Rob Dickey











Hi Tracy, JesterXL,



Thanks for both replies and suggestions. Both
worked great, although I think Ill stick to the last suggestion (editField)
as 

It would take more comments then code to
explain why I am reassigning the data provider to the grid that its
already assigned to J



Regards,

Rob









From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005
5:56 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders]
CheckCellRenderer





Example:

dataGrid.dataProvider[i].cbSelect = newState;

becomes:

dataGrid.dataProvider.editField(i,
cbSelect, newState);

- Original Message - 
From: Tracy Spratt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 8:57 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] CheckCellRenderer


This form of update:
dataGrid.dataProvider[i].cbSelect = newState
does not cause the dataProvider to emit the
modelChanged event to update
the control.

Instead, use the dataProvider API, like
editItemAt().

Or, probably better in your case, when you are
done updating the
dataProvider, re-assign it to the control:
Datagrid.DataProvider = DataGrid.dataProvider;

This should cause the proper events to fire and
update the screen.

Tracy

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com]
On
Behalf Of rb_dickey
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 7:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] CheckCellRenderer

Hi,

I'm trying to do a simple loop through a datagrid
to set a column 
that's using the CheckCellRenderer to be checked
or unchecked but 
the following code does not work, well sort
of. What happens is 
that if I mouseover each row, viola,
the checks in the checkbox 
appear or disappear depending on my choice to
select all or not. 
Here is the function I call to set the checkboxes
in the grid:

private function selectAll(newState:Boolean):Void
{
for( var i in dataGrid.dataProvider )
dataGrid.dataProvider[i].cbSelect = newState;
}

The datagrid column is defined as:
mx:DataGridColumn headerText=
width=40 columnName=cbSelect 
cellRenderer=CheckCellRenderer
resizable=true /

The dataprovider for the grid is an RO...

TIA for any info.
Rob







--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links











--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com

Yahoo! Groups Links














--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

RE: [flexcoders] AJAX vs Flex whitepaper?? anyone??

2005-10-26 Thread Rob Dickey

Just curious if you have taken a look at http://www.osflash.org ?

Don't know about whitepapers, abstracts, but its a great source for ECMA
related items including javascript, actionscript, etc., and perhaps there
are links from there to something that would suit your needs...

HTH
Rob


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 6:21 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] AJAX vs Flex whitepaper?? anyone??

Don't know of one, but if you find one, please let us ( and me know 
offlist), thanks!  And good luck.

- Original Message - 
From: Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:02 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] AJAX vs Flex whitepaper?? anyone??


Hi Folks,

I'm looking for a business and technical level whitepaper that
develops on the differences and similarities between flex and AJAX. It
is for a customer that is evaluating both techs for a series of
applications.

I'm not asking wether this is a good or bad comparison to make, but it
is a fact that they ARE doing this comparison. so I have to go along
with it. and hopefully win!

I would go on and do a live presentation as I usually do, but I'm in
sanfrancisco and my clients are back in south america.

Thanks,
Aldo

--
: Aldo Bucchi :
mobile (56) 8 429 8300



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links







--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

  Visit your group flexcoders on the web.
  
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM
~- 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[flexcoders] Anyone seen this...Bueller???

2005-05-12 Thread Rob Dickey

Ok, so I'm happily (well, most of the time) coding away in Flex Builder.I am
using Tomcat as my testing server, which has been working great for months.I
have a non-trial license for both Flex and FlexBuilder.and much to my dismay
I get the following message when testing my app within FlexBuilder.

This error comes up during the initialization phase of the app in 8pt red
font.and I'm done.

This standalone application was created with the Developer edition of
Macromedia Flex and has expired. Contact the author of this application for
a new copy.

Well, at this point I'm asking myself, self, where can I get another copy
of the application that you building???

Sorry for the weak attempt at some humor, but its been a long night with
deadlines approaching too soon.

TIA for any info.

Rob



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

RE: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

RE: [flexcoders] Destroying/Re-creating Objects

RE: [flexcoders] CheckCellRenderer

RE: [flexcoders] AJAX vs Flex whitepaper?? anyone??

[flexcoders] Anyone seen this...Bueller???

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information