On Friday 05 January 2007 16:07, Stembert Olivier (BIL) wrote:
the view and the command are better decoupled with the ViewHelper
pattern, no?
ViewHelper isn't recommended anymore, is it ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to competently compete 24/7 mindshares
Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Chiverton
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:16 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Cairngorm / MVC Best Practice
On Friday 05 January 2007 16:07, Stembert Olivier (BIL) wrote:
the view
I don't know. Why is it still in the framework?
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Chiverton
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:16 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Cairngorm / MVC Best Practice
:04 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Cairngorm / MVC Best Practice
It's Thursday afternoon, which means my bi-weekly question everything
I've just coded and contemplate serious internal changes on the
project. This week the insanity relates to Cairngorm or perhaps Model
View
On Thursday 04 January 2007 22:03, Jamie O wrote:
2) Is there a way - similar to how a delegate can have a series of
functionname_onResult, functionname_onFault - that you can have one
command deal with multiple onResult scenarios?
We have all our Events take the current object as the first
We have all our Events take the current object as the first parameter
(i.e. 'this').
The Command then calls
savedFromEventHome.onCommandName(result)
in onResult.
Could that do what you want ?
interesting.
do these objects then implement some kind of interface to support the
On Friday 05 January 2007 14:51, Martin Wood-Mitrovski wrote:
do these objects then implement some kind of interface to support the
'onCommandName(result)' method or do you type it in some other way?
No, you could (should ?) write an interface class and import it though, yes.
As long as we
] Cairngorm / MVC Best Practice
On Friday 05 January 2007 14:51, Martin Wood-Mitrovski wrote:
do these objects then implement some kind of interface to support the
'onCommandName(result)' method or do you type it in some other way?
No, you could (should ?) write an interface class and import it though
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 14:51, Martin Wood-Mitrovski wrote:
do these objects then implement some kind of interface to support the
'onCommandName(result)' method or do you type it in some other way?
No, you could (should ?) write an interface class and import it though,
It's Thursday afternoon, which means my bi-weekly question everything
I've just coded and contemplate serious internal changes on the
project. This week the insanity relates to Cairngorm or perhaps Model
View Controller design pattern in general, and the best practices of
it's implementation.
10 matches
Mail list logo