It's a pretty hot topic on the web, the battle PureMVC vs Cairngorm.
Imho, PureMVC is a bit more complicated to put in place, but is a
great pleasure to use after set up.
The best'd be to test them both if you have time :)
Regards,
Romain de Wolff
Le 13 nov. 08 à 17:18, gabriel montagné a
17, 2008 2:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Cairngorm for AS3 projects?
It's a pretty hot topic on the web, the battle PureMVC vs Cairngorm.
Imho, PureMVC is a bit more complicated to put in place, but is a great
pleasure to use after set up.
The best'd
Is there any reason not to use cairngorm for AS3 projects. I know
cairngorm uses classes in the mx.* range so its using some flex
framework code (and I assume that means adding the 126kb framework
code at least..)
is there a framework AS3 projects use instead?
thanks
You could take a look at PureMVC.
PS
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Rick Schmitty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason not to use cairngorm for AS3 projects. I know
cairngorm uses classes in the mx.* range so its using some flex
framework code (and I assume that means adding the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Rick Schmitty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason not to use cairngorm for AS3 projects. [...]
Cairngorm is definitely a Flex thing, it's dependencies are not superficial;
it wouldn't make much sense to try to use it on a pure AS3 project. You'd
have to
Hi Rick,
In the past we developed several AS2 Flash (not Flex) applications in
Cairngorm. In the current version of of Cairngorm almost all of the
dependencies on mx packages are in the ServiceLocator, which used not
to be the case with earlier Cairngorm versions. You can roll your own
6 matches
Mail list logo
