Hey all,
I took a quick search, but was unable to find info on rather
getter/setters are faster, or functions that return are faster. Care to
enlighten me?
--
-Joe
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Getters/Setters VS Function:Void/Return
Hey all,
I took a quick search, but was unable to find info on rather
getter/setters are faster, or functions that return are faster. Care to
enlighten me?
--
-Joe
8:34 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [flexcoders] Getters/Setters VS Function:Void/Return
Hey all,
I took a quick search, but was unable to find info on rather
getter/setters are faster, or functions that return are faster. Care to
enlighten me?
--
-Joe
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Getters/Setters VS Function:Void/Return
So, if I read your response correctly. You guys are working towards
optimizing the getter/setter way of doing things. Good to know. (Event
technically, there is no declared victor as of right now.)
Thanks Gordon
--
*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Joseph Curtin
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:15 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Getters/Setters VS Function:Void/Return
So, if I read your response correctly. You guys
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Getters/Setters VS Function:Void/Return
So, if I read your response correctly. You guys are working towards
optimizing the getter/setter way of doing things. Good to know. (Event
technically, there is no declared victor as of right now.)
Thanks Gordon
On Wed, May
6 matches
Mail list logo