Re: [flexcoders] MXML schema

2008-06-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mark Volkmann wrote:
 Is there an official XML Schema for MXML? 

Not for Flex 3.

 If so, where can I get it? 

The xsd4mxml project can make you one though.

-- 
Tom Chiverton



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at 
Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB.  A list 
of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference 
to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP.  
Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! 
Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[flexcoders] MXML schema

2008-05-31 Thread Mark Volkmann
Is there an official XML Schema for MXML? If so, where can I get it?



Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2007-04-04 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Tuesday 03 Apr 2007, neilac wrote:
 However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and
 therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted
 the correct schema?

Hi, I maintain that schema :-)
What does XMLSpy complain about ? I and others use the schema daily with 
Eclipse's WebTools project without any issues at all, but if there is 
something up with it that I can fix I'll look at it.

-- 
Tom Chiverton
Helping to collaboratively generate sticky platforms
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[flexcoders] MXML Schema

2007-04-03 Thread neilac3333
I am new to Flex and looking for the XML Schema document that defines
the structure of an MXML document. I have found a schema at the
following URL:

http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd

However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and
therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted
the correct schema?

Thanks very much.



RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2007-04-03 Thread Gordon Smith
We no longer provide a schema for MXML. The language was designed to be
easily written by a human and isn't well-suited to being described in a
schema -- it's too loosy-goosy in terms of what can nest inside what,
whether you write a property as an attribute or child tag, etc.The
schema we offered for Flex 1.5 was so large it didn't perform well and
it was pretty much unmaintainable and inextensible so with Flex 2.0 we
stopped providing one.
 
- Gordon



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of neilac
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 9:38 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] MXML Schema



I am new to Flex and looking for the XML Schema document that defines
the structure of an MXML document. I have found a schema at the
following URL:

http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd http://falkensweb.com/mxml2.xsd 

However, according to XMLSpy, this schema is not well-formed and
therefore not valid. Can you please point me to where Adobe has posted
the correct schema?

Thanks very much.



 


[flexcoders] MXML schema

2007-03-14 Thread Jock
I've read in several articles, eg...

* http://www.adobe.com/ap/products/flex/productinfo/tooling/
* http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/paradigm.html

...that there is a schema for mxml that can be used in various IDEs.
Where can I find this schema? I have downloaded the Flex 2 SDK but
it's not to be found anywhere.

Many thanks,

Gordon



RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2005-05-31 Thread Roger Gonzalez
There are quite a few constructs that turned out to be extremely
expensive to put in the schema.  In theory, none of them would prevent
validation of your document, they would only be unavailable for hinting.
As it is, the schema is horribly complex but represents a reasonable
compromise in correctness vs. usefulness.

If you bump into certain limitations, you are welcome to add them, but
be aware that small changes to the schema can make it unusable for
run-time hinting in many tools.

-Roger

Roger Gonzalez
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 -Original Message-
 From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reto M. Kiefer
 Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:18 PM
 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema
 
 Hi Blake,
 
  As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags
  aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the 
 parent tag.
  So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code:
 
 Thnaks for your replay, I didn't studied the thread ColumnChart 
 intensivly because right now I'm far away from developing a charting 
 application...
 
 But nevertheless regardless if the lowercase-tags are objects or 
 shourtcuts for the parent's attributes they should be provided within 
 the xml schema definition, but they aren't. I studied the schema 
 carefully, they don't appear neither as attributes to their 
 parent tags 
 nor as alowed children tags.
 
 Cheers
 
 Reto
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 
 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2005-05-20 Thread Manish Jethani
On 5/19/05, Reto M. Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Macromedia ships a file called mxml.xsd with Flex.
[...]

 But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is not
 complete.
[...]

I think you're right.  See Roger's email on this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders@yahoogroups.com/msg01744.html


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[flexcoders] MXML Schema

2005-05-19 Thread Reto M. Kiefer
Dear all,

not a direct question but I'd like to discuss this issue with you.
I'm using Eclipse for Developing Flex with the oXygen-Plugin (XML), ASDT 
(ActionScript Plugin) and Sysdeo (Tomcat monitoring  SOAP-Debugging!). 
It works like a charm and i prefer it instead of using Flexbuilder. 
Moreover I can code directly my logic tier (Java and PHP) without 
switching the IDE.

Macromedia ships a file called mxml.xsd with Flex. It is declared to be 
a generated XML-Schema for XMLM by the compiler. The oXygen-Plugin 
provides functionalities in order to provide code-hinting while 
developing MXML (like Flexbuilder).

But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is not 
complete. For example while beeing in a mx:operation within a 
mx:Webservice no hinting for result or concurenncy is provided. 
Checking the Schema with a Schema-Browser results in that attributes or 
sub-tags for mx:operation are not provided.

I'd like to know from you if you have exerienced other missing elements 
in the Schema. Or do you know a source for obtaining a complete Schema?

Thanks in andvance

CU

Reto



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2005-05-19 Thread Blake Kadatz
 But some featrues are missing, so I have a hunch that the Scheme is
 not complete. For example while beeing in a mx:operation within a 
 mx:Webservice no hinting for result or concurenncy is provided. 
 Checking the Schema with a Schema-Browser results in that attributes
 or sub-tags for mx:operation are not provided.

As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags
aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the parent tag.
So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code:

   mx:ColumnChart ...
  mx:verticalAxis ...
 ...
  /mx:verticalAxis
   /mx:ColumnChart

Is the same as:

   mx:ColumnChart verticalAxis=... ...
  ...
   /mx:ColumnChart


Cheers,

Blake


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema

2005-05-19 Thread Reto M. Kiefer
Hi Blake,

 As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags
 aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the parent tag.
 So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code:

Thnaks for your replay, I didn't studied the thread ColumnChart 
intensivly because right now I'm far away from developing a charting 
application...

But nevertheless regardless if the lowercase-tags are objects or 
shourtcuts for the parent's attributes they should be provided within 
the xml schema definition, but they aren't. I studied the schema 
carefully, they don't appear neither as attributes to their parent tags 
nor as alowed children tags.

Cheers

Reto



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema validation

2005-03-06 Thread Spike
Looks to me like the Schema is wrong. It doesn't allow for any 
attributes of mx:operation and permits only the mx:request tag as a 
child.

Anyone know if I can get my hands on on that's correct?
Spike
Spike wrote:
Does anyone know whether the MXML Schema that comes with Flex 1.5 really 
can be used for validation?

Xerces is telling me that the mx:operation tag isn't allowed to have a 
name attribute. The Flex documentation clearly states the opposite is 
true and the tag would be pretty useless without it, so what is it 
that's going wrong?

Xerces or the Schema?
I've had a quick look at the schema myself, but my eyes started to glaze 
over by the time I got to about line 5000.

Spike
--

Stephen Milligan
Code poet for hire
http://www.spike.org.uk
Do you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org