Re: [flexcoders] Re: [Req] What do you (love|hate|wish for) about (mx.*|Cairngorm|PureMVC|Mate|Prana|BlazeDS)?

2009-02-14 Thread Richard Rodseth
Hi Josh I'm also pleased with Mate. I like how they've gone to great lengths to allow views to be framework-agnostic. The dependency-injection that sets up bindings rather than purely injecting values is nifty too. This makes MVP or model adaptors simpler. One downside is a loss of type safety in

[flexcoders] Re: [Req] What do you (love|hate|wish for) about (mx.*|Cairngorm|PureMVC|Mate|Prana|BlazeDS)?

2009-02-13 Thread jim.abbott45
Just as a suggestion, Why not take Maté and add Java/BlazeDS support to it? (OK, I admit it, I really like what I've seen of Maté so far--IMHO a Developer could do a lot worse using another framework.) --Jim --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Josh McDonald j...@... wrote: Hey guys, I have a