Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-19 Thread Sam Shrefler
John, I know you had said you were using webServices...but if you can possibly refactor, using WebOrb.NET Standard (free), you can transfer back and forth classes/objects..For more info you can check out http://blog.shrefler.net/?p=6 Hope that could help... Sam On 9/18/06, John C. Bland II

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-19 Thread John C. Bland II
I have heard a lot of good things about WebOrb. The next version of the app will be rid of the web services so we'll see what works best.On 9/19/06, Sam Shrefler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, I know you had said you were using webServices...but if you can

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-18 Thread John C. Bland II
I'm using WS because it is what was created for the project. The next revision will be using remoting.Serializing the returned data just seems like an extra step that is unnecessary. If I can return a List of User objects and Flex receives it and I can access it as an ArrayCollection, etc then

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-18 Thread John C. Bland II
I don't have a problem getting data. Sending native classes/objects is a problem. :-)On 9/18/06, barry.beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, the July issue of ColdFusion Developers Journal has an article on using Flex's class introspection to automate

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-14 Thread Sam Shrefler
John: I'm a little confused by your reply. Could you educate me why you are using WS's if you feel you could use remoting? Also, JSON plugs right into Web Services. It simply serializes and deserializes the data to allow for easy transfers of data types. Sam On 9/8/06, John C. Bland II

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-10 Thread John C. Bland II
Nah, I'm not interested in JSON. If we weren't using WSs we'd be using Remoting. Thanks though.On 9/7/06, Sam Shrefler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John: You might want to also check out JSON + .NET + Flex. I've written a tiny little little tutorial to help get

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-08 Thread Sam Shrefler
John: You might want to also check out JSON + .NET + Flex. I've written a tiny little little tutorial to help get people started at: http://blog.shrefler.net/?p=5 Sam On 9/5/06, John C. Bland II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FLIPPIN' NAMESPACEI set the namespace and I'm rollin'! Now I

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-07 Thread John C. Bland II
Which code are you referring to seeing? I can't pass the WS code or url. As for the Flex code, it is based 100% off of the livedocs example but with our url's, etc.We don't use .NET datasets. We are returning VO's (classes) or Listclassname. This is .NET 2.0 so generics are used

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-07 Thread John C. Bland II
FLIPPIN' NAMESPACEI set the namespace and I'm rollin'! Now I can finish this app. :-) Thanks.On 9/5/06, John C. Bland II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Which code are you referring to seeing? I can't pass the WS code or url. As for the Flex code, it is based 100% off of the livedocs example but

[flexcoders] Re: Flex + .NET Web Services irritations

2006-09-05 Thread Tim Hoff
Hi John, Without seeing the code, the first error seems E4X related. I'm not sure if this will help you with the second error, but natively Flex doesn't accept .Net datasets without receiving this error. If that's the case, you can solve this by casting the dataset to a class that is returned