To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
You can tell the compiler to include any class you want, as well as
whatever it thinks you want, right? Or is that only valid for SWCs?
-Josh
--
Therefore, send not to know For whom
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Josh McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*shudder*
That's a bad idea unless the clean up imports builder
functionalituy is
rewritten to a) function, and b) be something you can control when
and if it
runs ;-)
That's why I suggested a switch. But I
Yeah, I was definitely complaining more about builder than I was about your
idea :)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Amy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I suggested a switch. But I routinely go in and clean out
the import statements of stuff I decided not to use ;-), so maybe it's
Alex,
Say for instance, you want to create this instance, from a class name
defined in XML, and make it totally dynamic, using this work-around
does not solve that problem.
This function should really be improved, or, at least the
documentation should really be supplemented to explain more in
Of djhatrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:32 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
Alex,
Say for instance, you want to create this instance, from a class name
defined in XML, and make it totally dynamic, using this work-around
Of djhatrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:32 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
Alex,
Say for instance, you want to create this instance, from a class name
defined in XML, and make it totally dynamic, using this work-around
does
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of djhatrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:32 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
Alex,
Say for instance, you want to create this instance, from a class name
defined
two,
they kinda feel good sometimes.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of djhatrick
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:56 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes
My colleagues will tell you that I swear at the computer too, and pound my
desk and flop on the ground and cry. You should try the latter two, they
kinda feel good sometimes.
We keep Alex in a row by himself for this reason.
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
My colleagues will tell you that I swear at the computer too, and
pound my desk and flop on the ground and cry. You should try the latter
two, they kinda feel good sometimes.
We keep Alex in a row by himself
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Classes take up room in the SWF, so we only put in classes we know you
need otherwise your SWF would always be 1MB or more.
getDefinitionByName is a roll call. If you aren't in the room, you
won't answer.
Maybe
:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Matt Chotin
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:10 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex woes, wo-iz-o, i hate it (sometimes)
My colleagues will tell you that I swear at the computer too, and pound
*shudder*
That's a bad idea unless the clean up imports builder functionalituy is
rewritten to a) function, and b) be something you can control when and if it
runs ;-)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Amy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can tell the compiler to include any class you want, as well as whatever
it thinks you want, right? Or is that only valid for SWCs?
-Josh
--
Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee.
:: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
:: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can compile a class into an external swf and load that, then get the
class out of it. Works great if you don't know what classes you need until
runtime, but don't want to bloat your main swf.
*Steve Mathews*
*Senior Team Lead*
*Flypaper Studio, Inc.*
*www.flypaper.com*
On Wed, Jul 30,
Of course you'll have to switch to an asynchronous analogue of
getDefinitionByName if you're loading SWFs on demand like JARs.
-Josh
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Steve Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can compile a class into an external swf and load that, then get the
class out of
16 matches
Mail list logo