Hi Kevin,
we are putting a new blog that hopefully will bring that kind of things in
September. As the new blog will be spanish, that kind of entries will be
posted in english as well.
this is the URL:
http://teamblog.codeoscopic.com/
I'll post here when we have a first entry on that stuff
Carlos
I thought I'd have a look at your site and check it out. When I clicked on the
drop down menu for languages and selected (I think it was the spanish flag), I
got the following error:
ArgumentError: Invalid address: null.
at com.google.maps.services::ClientGeocoder/geocode()
Thanks,
that error is known and is caused by the workaround with google maps flex
component and frameworks like papervision. We'll fix it in the upcoming
days.
Thanks for the report! :)
2009/8/24 valdhor valdhorli...@embarqmail.com
Carlos
I thought I'd have a look at your site and check
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Full flex site or not
Hi Kevin,
we are putting a new blog that hopefully will bring that kind of things in
September. As the new blog will be spanish, that kind of entries will be posted
in english as well
You could go with a full flex site that support SEO. We did it with our site
at Codeoscopic:
http://www.codeoscopic.com
but we as well use html to get the SEO capabilities, so you get the best of
both worlds ;)
for example try to search for codeoscopic avant and you get something like
:
I like the codeoscopic site and especially the transitions from section to
section. Would you mind sharing some insights on how you put that together?
General approach, that kind of stuff. Animations from one section to another
are also very smooth. Nice work.
Thanks,
Kevin
On 8/23/09 10:57 AM,
Google doesn't index anything af the hash value (#) so this doesn't
work in a larger more dynamic websites since it looks like all content
is provided in the single HTML source. I'm also dubious of Google
indexing content inside of a SWF since I haven't seen any sites that
are full-flash enabled
If I were building a site, rather than an app in Flash, this is what I'd do:
1) All data exposed as 3 forks:
#1: mydomain/xml/my/content/url
#2: mydomain/xhtml/my/content/url
#3: mydomain/flash#/my/content/url
2) Flash pulls all data from #1
3) #2 is an XSLT transform (or templating engine,
If you are a competitor of mine, build a full flex site, otherwise HTML is the
way to go for SEO. ;)
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, christophe_jacquelin
christophe_jacque...@... wrote:
Hello,
Is it better to make a full flex site or is it better to add some html pages
with flex to
Google already indexes SWF content, they talked about it at MAX last
November.
Here is a recording of the presentation: http://tv.adobe.com/#vi+f15384v1000
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:09 AM, toofah_gm ga...@byu.edu wrote:
If you are a competitor of mine, build a full flex site, otherwise HTML
This presentation mentions no network access (yet) and no sockets - This
probably means that amf based flex apps will not be indexed.
I am not sure though, anybody with more info is welcome to comment
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Nate Beck n...@tldstudio.com wrote:
Google already indexes
But, it is largely believed that google does not yet offer a way to
search the swf content it is indexing.
Can you provide me one example that says otherwise? Ryan Stewart had a
contest, which just fizzled because no one could get their SWF to show
up in a Google search. Has that
12 matches
Mail list logo
