ad the annotations
> and you'd be all set.
>
> Jeff
>
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Josh McDonald
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:00 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: How Could I
This is just the flex vo side. No change to the java transfer object is
necessary; for transient fields that live only in the flex app.
-TH
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Josh McDonald wrote:
>
> That still requires adding the fields to the Flex object. Marking the
field
> @Transient in Ja
class had the annotations and you'd be
all set.
Jeff
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Josh McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: How Could I "not" map
That still requires adding the fields to the Flex object. Marking the field
@Transient in Java will affect Hibernate, unless Blaze / LCDS have their own
@Transient I'm not aware of. There's also this blazeds annotations add-on:
http://is.gd/sETx
SmartyPants-J will do this, but it's nowhere near es
Yep, here's an example:
private var _myProperty:String;
[Transient]
[Bindable( event="myPropertyChange" )]
/**
* myProperty.
* @private
*/
public function get myProperty():String
{
return _myProperty;
}
/** @private */
public function set myProperty( value:String ):void
{
_myPro
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ouaqa wrote:
>
>
> This is an option but i was wondering if you couldn't use some special
> "ninja" keyword telling lcds not to map the field to lcds.
Transient?
If it were me, I would leave the java and as objects as they were and create a
new class extending the java object. Now you can add all the properties that
hibernate wants and send it.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ouaqa wrote:
>
>
> I am developping a J2EE/Flex Application and we recent
7 matches
Mail list logo
