We are told that the SWF compiler optimizes to remove unused classes.
However, I have had some inconsistent results:
http://www.flextras.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/6/25/How-does-SWC-size-affet-SWF-size
I suspect--but never verified--that this is due to static classes or classes w/
static methods.
Jeffry, it would be interesting to see the link-reports from your tests.
On 4/14/10 11:25 AM, Jeffry Houser j...@dot-com-it.com wrote:
We are told that the SWF compiler optimizes to remove unused classes.
However, I have had some inconsistent results:
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: SWC's vs. source
We are told that the SWF compiler optimizes to remove unused classes.
However, I have had some inconsistent results:
http://www.flextras.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/6/25/How-does-SWC-size-affet
-SWF-size
http://www.flextras.com/blog/index.cfm
I'm not sure if I should feel foolish for asking or not; but what is a
link-report and how do I get it? Some compiler option?
I created the files; recorded the final file sizes. It was close to a year
ago now; so to redo anything I'd have to start from scratch. I could put it on
my
It is an MXMLC option. -link-report=somexmlfile.
It will show you all classes in the SWF. I think there is a tool called
itDepends that can help you read one.
No big deal to me if you never get to it.
On 4/14/10 4:09 PM, Jeffry Houser j...@dot-com-it.com wrote:
I'm not sure if I
5 matches
Mail list logo
