Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2009-04-10 Thread Kusunam, Srinivas
Nathan Claudieu, Thanks for the response. After I posted my question I started reading and thinking how to correct this and came up with the same idea Nathan suggested. I started refactoring everything and so far it is going great. On Apr 10, 2009, at 3:46 AM, nathanpdaniel

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm - Question on using ResultHandler

2007-01-29 Thread Dimitrios Gianninas
Well if your remote call is returning an object, then u do event.result ... if its returning a list of objects and u need to access the first, second, etc.. element then do event.result[0]. If its a map, then do event.result[keyname] Dimitrios Gianninas RIA Developer Optimal Payments Inc.

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2006-06-06 Thread Steven Webster
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question Steven,As a request. I am very interested in your teams ideas of the cairngorm framework that fully utilizes Flex Data Services. I assume the Flex2 release isnt far away and I hope an example

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2006-06-05 Thread Steven Webster
Hi guys, As I'm sure you're aware, the product team are gearing up for Flex 2 release. As the product goes through it's final revs towards release, we're focussing our time on ensuring that the next release of Cairngorm and the samples are aligned with the final product release. There will be

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2006-06-05 Thread Bjorn Schultheiss
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Webster Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 7:41 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question Hi guys, As I'm sure you're aware, the product team are gearing up for Flex 2 release. As the product goes through it's final revs

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-25 Thread Leon Tanner
around it? Thanks L -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darron J. Schall Sent: 24 January 2006 00:45 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Dave Wolf wrote: I was just

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-25 Thread Leon Tanner
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Watson Sent: 24 January 2006 18:32 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Hi Leon, This mxmlc option will enable setting the amfgateway url @ runtime: -remoteallowurloverride It will allow you

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-24 Thread Leon Tanner
-Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darron J. Schall Sent: 24 January 2006 00:45 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Dave Wolf wrote: I was just shown your weblog today about

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-24 Thread Peter Watson
@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Ok, we've gone down the route of using mxmlc.jar for precompilation. The reason is purely to include data within the SWF to save a return trip to the server - and also to reduce the load on the server at initial request time. Our process

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-23 Thread Anatole Tartakovsky
For large applications I believe you have to do a bit of refactoring and start playing with RSLs. Aside of the obvious reasons of performance gain during development by eliminating unnecessary recompilation it kind of force you to eliminate weak links and create "layered" components -

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-23 Thread Darron J. Schall
Dave Wolf wrote: We are firm believers of precompiling our applications when in production rather then using the JIT MXML compiler. We are big proponents of ANT and automate the builds of not only the MXML but of the entire production server. With one command line we build the entire site

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-23 Thread Darron J. Schall
Dave Wolf wrote: I was just shown your weblog today about this and they are awesome. The crazy part is they look a ton like ours. Guess you have a couple of smart people and they reach the same conclusions! Really great posting Darron. We have tons of macros for everything from compiling

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question

2006-01-17 Thread Robin Hilliard
Hi YJ, Sure - the Cairngorm code is unmodified. For instance, in your view you might have: private var viewHelper : OurViewHelper; private var searchDefinition : SearchDefinitionVO; ... EventBroadcaster.getInstance().broadcastEvent (OurController.SEARCH_COMMAND,

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alberto Albericio Salvador
Thank you Daniel, if no more suggestions/corrections are done, I will take that choice. Of course a recovery plan was planed plus de mute option is also welcome. :) Daniel Harfleet escribió: Alberto, this seems a fair approach to me, you may also want to include some logic to disconnect from

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alex Uhlmann
Hi Alberto, in addition to what Dan said, you could create an object similar to Business Delegates used for request/response remote calls - in applications that we have developed, we call these Listeners. These listeners provide control and protection for your server push remote services.

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alberto Albericio Salvador
Hi Alex, I like the idea of Listeners and they way you point to manage server pushes injecting events and data to the Cairngorm architecture. Mainly because server pushes are treat just like if they were data from a user-gesture. If possible, send me a sample code for one of these Listeners,

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alberto Albericio Salvador
: 30 August 2005 14:25 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question Hi Alex, I like the idea of Listeners and they way you point to manage server pushes injecting events and data to the Cairngorm architecture. Mainly because server pushes are treat just like

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alberto Albericio Salvador
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question Hi Alex, I like the idea of Listeners and they way you point to manage server pushes injecting events and data to the Cairngorm architecture. Mainly because server pushes are treat just like if they were data from a user-gesture. If possible, send

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question

2005-08-30 Thread Alex Uhlmann
iteration::two -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto Albericio Salvador Sent: 30 August 2005 18:32 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question Hi again, Im trying to create a business