subject:"RE\: \[flexcoders\] XML vs Model\?"

RE: [flexcoders] XML vs Model?

2005-05-17 Thread Abdul Qabiz

They are similar things IMO. If you specify a source file for XML or Model tag, source (xml)file is compiled into swf. So no loading on runtime but a large initial swf size. P I think, Model should be good at performance because it is simple Object not a XMLNode. Let's see, what other people

RE: [flexcoders] XML vs Model?

2005-05-17 Thread Tracy Spratt

yet. And I hear that improved XML support is on the way. Tracy -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abdul Qabiz Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:08 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] XML vs Model

Re: [flexcoders] XML vs Model?

2005-05-17 Thread Indy Nagpal

: RE: [flexcoders] XML vs Model? They are similar things IMO. If you specify a source file for XML or Model tag, source (xml)file is compiled into swf. So no loading on runtime but a large initial swf size. P I think, Model should be good at performance because it is simple Object

Re: [flexcoders] XML vs Model?

2005-05-17 Thread Scott Barnes

. Tracy -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abdul Qabiz Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:08 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] XML vs Model? They are similar things IMO. If you specify a source file