Use a testing server, don’t run from file://
On 2/2/12 9:45 AM, Greg Lafrance glafra...@chikaradev.com wrote:
Our app has a main module with link button, and clicking each link button
loads different modules in the main content area.
For only one module, we get a Security Sandbox
If you get that output but the application does not halt, then you can ignore
it.
If you want it to be sandboxed, then you can’t access things in it. You would
not need a crossdomain.xml file.
If you are using Flex 4, make sure you added the option
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
If you get that output but the application does not halt, then you can ignore
it.
If you want it to be sandboxed, then you can't access things in it. You would
not need a crossdomain.xml file
[mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:40 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
If you get that output but the application does not halt, then you can ignore
it.
If you want
SDK 3.3
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:28 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
Which version of Flex are you using?
On 9/1/10 9:50 AM
:
SDK 3.3
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:28 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] *** Security Sandbox Violation ***
Which version of Flex are you using?
On 9/1/10 9:50 AM
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that if you launch it in
standalone player, you shouldn't get the security error, well, maybe for
system or read-only files, or, maybe due to other system restrictions, but
generally it should just work...
Yes, that's what I'm seeing with both URLLoader and HTTPService. So I guess
my question becomes:
How do you debug this stuff in FB ?
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Oleg Sivokon olegsivo...@gmail.comwrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that if you launch it in
standalone
Sorry, are you running it in standalone player or in browser? There
shouldn't be a problem if you run it in standalone player.
Potentially both. The client wishes to host it on a web server (with no app
server/db access) but it could also get run from the desktop, unless we
provide the wrapper as part of our solution. The browser version is
required.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Oleg Sivokon
And both seem to work when I'm launching from the desktop, but not from the
debugger.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Richard Rodseth rrods...@gmail.com wrote:
Potentially both. The client wishes to host it on a web server (with no app
server/db access) but it could also get run from the
Not sure I get it, how do you launch that from debugger? There are several
options available in FB (and few more in SDK and in alternative debuggers),
you can launch in browser, and if you have debug player installed there, it
will start the debugger client in FB, or, you can launch in standalone
It's possible I have multiple players on my system, and FB is using a
different one. By launch, I just meant using the Run/Launch button within FB
as opposed to finding the wrapper html in the Finder and opening it.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Oleg Sivokon olegsivo...@gmail.com wrote:
When you click launch it may either launch in browser or in standalone
player. Which one does it launch?
Standard behavior in FB is to launch in browser (the html-wrapper folder
gets copied to bin-debug with template items filled in. I'm guessing you
aren't an FB user - I'm not away of any other way to launch from within FB.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Oleg Sivokon olegsivo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am, but I usually compile with Ant and launch the player from the
build script. So, I really didn't remember which are the default settings.
Well, that's not really related. In your case you'd need to configure the
builder to launch whatever it compiles in the run configuration follow
Uh oh. So there appears to be a Safari/Firefox difference. I was launching
Safari when opening the html file in the Finder, and Firefox in Eclipse.
Whichever way I launch (fb or Finder), I get the security error in Firefox,
and not in Safari.
Sorry for the confusion. So now I'm back to wondering
No, it is different. If the SWF is embedded in HTML page, it requires that
you specify the trusted locations on your machine, so it could load
content:
http://macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html
Read carefully the text in gray under the picture.
But, if
Not sure I follow that page, but it appears that the -use-network=false
compiler flag may be helpful for this scenario.
If only FB allowed you to set different compiler options for different
applications within a project.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Oleg Sivokon olegsivo...@gmail.com wrote:
Detach the NetStream from the video, draw it, attach the stream again - this
bug exists ever since there was this security limitation, my forecast it's
not going to be fixed in the upcoming year, so, you ought to be safe using
that :D
Best.
Oleg
For any run or just profiling? Normally the profiler swf shouldn't be in play.
If a profiler session dies it can leave itself in the mm.cfg or whatever your
OS equivalent is.
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Developer
Adobe Systems Inc.http://www.adobe.com/
Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
From:
I'm confused, if the app runs fine, then what is the problem? Your getting
a sandbox error because your trying to grab data from somewhere besides the
host application's home.
Alan
I get the error message when I debug a application.the application
works fine, but I get the message in debug
Are you testing this over http:// or file://
If file:// crossdomain.xml may not be in play.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of jwebbsuccess
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:50 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Security
Might be a bug or subtle intended behavior. Read up on the security doc to see
if it talks about that case. For sure, in local sandboxes, you can't back out
to higher folders using ..\ so maybe that check runs in Standalone player.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
When I got this error in my app
I set Security.allowDomain(*);
I am not sure that's the right way of doing stuff but that did take care of
my run time error and make my app up and running.
Thxs
Anuj
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:57 PM, brucewhealton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello all,
Anyone have
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:00 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Security Sandbox Violation message
When I got this error in my app
I set Security.allowDomain(*);
I am not sure that's the right way of doing stuff but that did take care of my
run time error
I made a workaround by using static images on my server, so the link
does not make the error anymore. It works fine in this situation, but
I'd still sure like to know what the answer to this is because I've run
into it before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have run into a problem with accessing
1. http://10.0.2.30/ is not the same domain as 10.0.2.30:80
2. If you type this into a browser, you should see your crossdomain xml
file: http://10.0.2.30:80/crossdomain.xml
http://10.0.2.30/crossdomain.xml
3. That crossdomain file is old, there are new required entries for the
latest Flash
Thanks Tracy, much appreciated.
I found your previous post and have been reading many of the articles
referenced and am still frusterated. I thought you were harsh with
your 'execute the jerks' comment but am almost ready to join you :-).
Unfortunately, I am still getting my sandbox violation
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg Hess
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 3:14 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Security sandbox violation error with socket
connection
Thanks Tracy, much appreciated.
I
] Security sandbox violation error with socket
connection
Thanks Tracy, much appreciated.
I found your previous post and have been reading many of the articles
referenced and am still frusterated. I thought you were harsh with
your 'execute the jerks' comment but am almost ready to join you
On Thursday 06 Dec 2007, sarah_e_boys wrote:
I was hoping someone could help me with this security violation error
I am getting. I recently uploaded my image gallery application to a
server and when I try to download an image via a zip file I get this
error. It was working fine locally.
You
The crossdomain.xml must be on www.lemonde.fr
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of thierrybertossa
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:34 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Security sandbox violation
I have a
It is possible, if aimexpress.oscar.aol.com http://aol.com:5190/ provides
a crossdomain.xml
Cheers
Ralf.
On 2/19/07, elad_nyc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Tynjala created the amazing application to connect to AIM (see
here:
What are you loading? Looks like the main SWF is on one domain and the
other SWF is on another domain? You might need to do
Security.allowDomain work?
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of lift69boy
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 4:56
Hi,How are you making AMFPHP connection? Are you using carlaabreu.com/../gateway.php or www.carlaabreu.com/../gateway.php
?I think, if you are trying to access data from a sub domain to main domain, it might be problem...Not sure, check the security whitepaper for the Maths behind it...-abdul
Has anyone learned any more about this
issue or come up with a solution?
I am experiencing a very similar problem:
images loaded from another domain are generating Security Sandbox Violations of
the form:
*** Security Sandbox Violation ***
SecurityDomain 'http://host1/foo' tried
he results of the RO call.
Jimmy
Gianninas
Software Developer -
Optimal Payments
Inc.
From: Kristopher Schultz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:49
PMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders]
Security Sandbox Violation when loading image
Well, I figured
:49
AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Security
Sandbox Violation when loading image
Well, I figured out why I was
experiencing different behavior when pulling data in from an XML file vs.
pulling it in via a remote object. My remote object method call was returning
Well, I figured out why I was experiencing different
behavior when pulling data in from an XML file vs. pulling it in via a remote
object. My remote object method call was returning an Array of objects which on
the Java side were instances of a simple data object class I had created called
Im not an expert at this by any
stretch. The security sandbox violation when dealing with images/movies
generally occurs because the SWF that did the loading (myserver.com/index.mxml)
tries to access properties of the loaded movie (otherserver.com/someImage, and
yes I realize it may not
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:32:14 -0800, Matt Chotin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wonder if Manish ran into this with the map example J
The map sample loads images from the same host, but the
flickr/delicious sample loads them directly from flickr.com.
42 matches
Mail list logo
