Michelle Thompson, W5NYV, and I are doing the Sunday lecture on Spectrum
challenges for amateur radio. That sounds boring, it won't be.
I will do boring parts as quickly as possible then we will use your analog
computer (brain) to do spectrum collaboration and your fun will be enhanced
by bringin
OK, mystery solved. Somehow port 80 had disappeared from the incoming
connections allow window along with some other things. Don't know how that
might have happened but problem solved. Thanks for the help
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRad
No problem here either.
73, Rich - W3ZJ
Ed Wilson wrote:
Geep,
Works fine here!
Ed, K0KC
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.ma
Weird. I had to make substantial changes on my firewall server last week and
there could be some outgoing rule that is causing it. Probably cockpit error.
Thanks guys for the reports
On May 18, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Ed Wilson wrote:
> Geep,
>
> Works fine here!
>
> Ed, K0KC
>
_
Works fine here too. You might try it by IP to see if it's a DNS issue on
your end.
www.arrl.org [184.106.62.248]
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Gordon P. Howell, Jr. wrote:
> I haven't been able to get into the ARRL site for several days, can't ping
> it either. Anyone else having these is
Geep,
Works fine here!
Ed, K0KC
From: "Gordon P. Howell, Jr."
To: FlexRadio reflector
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:10 AM
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL off line?
I haven't been able to get into the ARRL site for several days, can&#x
I haven't been able to get into the ARRL site for several days, can't ping it
either. Anyone else having these issues?
geep
wa4rts
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-ra
-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL HBC amp for 1500
hmmm Page not found!!
If Americans ever allow banks to control the issue of their currency,
first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks will deprive the people
of all property
until their children wake up homeless.
-Thomas Jefferson
400
> From: mat...@netcommander.com
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL HBC amp for 1500
>
> I've had several inquiries about this amp since I mentioned it in my
> last post. I responded directly to all of them but thought I would post
> this to
I've had several inquiries about this amp since I mentioned it in my
last post. I responded directly to all of them but thought I would post
this to the group to cover all bases.
This 50 watt amp project was the winner of the last ARRL Homebrew
challenge. There have been two runs of the PCB/pa
ARRL FMT tonight Tuesday April 12 (USA time)
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-frequency-measuring-test-scheduled-for-tuesday
-april-12
Also http://www.k5cm.com/
Your Flex, with no outboard equipment, is adequate to do a respectable job
in the FMT
Jeff K0OD
_
Ended up with 123 Qs and 51 countries. With the new Flex .19 software
the rig ran fantastic !!! Also the Bug sounds much better with less
computer adjustment. SDR is cool Antenna here is the ZeroFive 40
meter vertical , 60 radials 12 ft long each. Was surprised at the number
of stations on
( if you can copy cw, anyway )
a great opportunity to enjoy our marvelous receivers. there will be a large
number of ridiculously strong signals, with many weaker ones in between...
( shameless plug follows )
look for me, guest op at N8OO, ( I hope )..
73, w5xz, dan
___
At 06:35 PM 10/1/2009, Mike Penkas wrote:
ARRL members can see the revision to the 3K review in the November
issue on the ARRL website.
www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0911.pdf
page 8/9
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-ra
ARRL members can see the revision to the 3K review in the November issue on the
ARRL website.
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archi
Well done, Phil.
Congratulations to Bob and Frank. Your continual advancement of the
state of the art has rekindled the excitement of those long-gone novice
days when everything was new, and there was so much to learn and explore.
Thank you for that.
73, Dale
WA8SRA
Philip M. Lanese wrote:
>
> I think you have us confused with two guys with hair on their heads.
My heartfelt congratulations to two guys I greatly admire, regardless of
hair...
73,
Lyle KK7P
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.
Congratulations to Bob and Frank from this side of the pond.
José F5JD
Le jeudi 15 mai 2008 à 17:42 -0400, Philip M. Lanese a écrit :
> Just to let the cat out of the bag,
>
> I nominated Frank and Bob for the ARRL Atlantic Division 2008 Award for
> Technical Achievement back in March and was
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Neal Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next up for them is People Magazine's Sexiest Men of the Year (no I
> haven't yet nominated them..)
I think you have us confused with two guys with hair on their heads.
73
Frank
AB2KT
--
The only thing we have to fe
- Original Message -
From: "Philip M. Lanese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlexRadio"
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL AWARD
> Just to let the cat out of the bag,
>
> I nominated Frank and Bob for the ARRL Atlantic Division 2008 Awar
ent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL AWARD
> > I nominated Frank and Bob for the ARRL Atlantic Division 2008 Award for
Technical Achievement back in March and was notified this morning that our
favorite gurus won for their outstanding work in advancing the new wave of
ra
> I nominated Frank and Bob for the ARRL Atlantic Division 2008 Award for
> Technical Achievement back in March and was notified this morning that our
> favorite gurus won for their outstanding work in advancing the new wave of
> radio.
Congrats and very well deserved.
Next up for them is Peop
Just to let the cat out of the bag,
I nominated Frank and Bob for the ARRL Atlantic Division 2008 Award for
Technical Achievement back in March and was notified this morning that our
favorite gurus won for their outstanding work in advancing the new wave of
radio.
Phil, K3IB
__
Unfortunately, family commitments have limited my RTTY ROUNDUP time.
But:
I still hold High Score in zip code 60706, Single Op.
I did find that the TuneLatency/VAC issue did NOT appear.
Previously, activating the Tune Button to operate a auxiliary antenna tuner
or change antenna switch would resu
That's truly remarkable
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.
It is interesting the number of SDR-1000's and
their good performance in the ARRL Frequency
Measurement Test for 2007:
< http://www.b4h.net/fmt/fmtresults.php >
I just used my vanilla SDR-1000 and Spectrum Lab
audio software, no fancy oscillators, generators,
or standards, and managed <= 1 Hz o
> Lyle, you make an excellent point. But, you also make my point.
> When the ARRL wants to review a QRP rig, they go to a QRP expert.
> They should do the same thing when it comes to SDR - go to an SDR
> expert, or at the very least someone who has some SDR experience.
> (I think the QRP aspect o
Lyle Johnson wrote:
>> Have you seen the review in the September QST of the Hendricks QRP FireFly
>> SDR transceiver?
>> Its available now on the ARRL members website. Once again, the ARRL has
>> done injustice
>> to an SDR radio by having an SDR neophyte conduct the product review.
>
> The rev
At 06:00 AM 8/9/2007, Richard Smith wrote:
>Lyle, you make an excellent point. But, you also make my point. When the
>ARRL wants to review a QRP rig, they go to a QRP expert. They should do the
>same thing when it comes to SDR - go to an SDR expert, or at the very least
>someone who has some SDR
ther than focus on the frustrations of learning SDR?
73,
Rich W1EZ
- Original Message -
From: "Lyle Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL just doesn't get it (SDR)
>> Have you seen the review
Richard,
Suggest you send this or similar e-mail to ARRL: Dave Summer, Steve
Ford, Joe Hallas or all. They do have some computer literate persons on staff.
Chas, W1CG
At 12:21 AM 8/8/2007, you wrote:
>Have you seen the review in the September QST of the Hendricks QRP
>FireFly SDR transceiver?
> Have you seen the review in the September QST of the Hendricks QRP FireFly
> SDR transceiver?
> Its available now on the ARRL members website. Once again, the ARRL has done
> injustice
> to an SDR radio by having an SDR neophyte conduct the product review.
The reviewer, Rich Arland, is a very
Have you seen the review in the September QST of the Hendricks QRP FireFly SDR
transceiver? Its available now on the ARRL members website. Once again, the
ARRL has done injustice to an SDR radio by having an SDR neophyte conduct the
product review. The reviewer whines about how computer illit
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kirk
(KW5TX)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:59 AM
To: Flexradio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL
I belong to 10+ email reflectors... and get a ton of _off topic_ SPAM
a day.
I joined this group to stay on top of issues that pertain to the SD
Yeah, I hate those dial-up plans too.
Bob W6TR
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Loen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Skip K3CC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL
> Skip K3CC wrote:
>> Guys
code did it.So lets see what
goes on and give it all a chance.
I wonder what Dayton will be like with all of this.I know for sure it needed
help
Carl W9TAD
- Original Message -
From: "k5nwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexrad
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Larry Loen
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:55 AM
> To: Skip K3CC
> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL
>
> Can we all avoid this p
I belong to 10+ email reflectors... and get a ton of _off topic_ SPAM
a day.
I joined this group to stay on top of issues that pertain to the SDR1000
which I own.
Please stay on topic and go elsewhere for issues that do not relate
directly to the SDR1000 and FlexRadio.
thanks
KW5TX
W2AGN wr
Skip K3CC wrote:
> Guys I can't let this go by,
Can we all avoid this particular discussion _here_?
There's plenty of other forums available to cover this.
Have a heart, I only got so much e-mail space from my ISP!
Larry WO0Z
___
FlexRadio mail
Skip K3CC wrote:
> Please let it be known that the League has their own agenda, members.
>
The agenda seems to be to assist in turning the Amateur bands into one big
email
forwarding system for Winlink. See
http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST&f=3&t=150129
So I assume the new SDR-5
You forgot to insult children and women, you got everyone else covered.
At 12:24 AM 4/5/2007, you wrote:
>Guys I can't let this go by, The American Rat Race League is the only voice
>of Ham radio. I am a life member cause it was only a couple of hundred
>dollars in the 60's when I became one.
>
Guys I can't let this go by, The American Rat Race League is the only voice
of Ham radio. I am a life member cause it was only a couple of hundred
dollars in the 60's when I became one.
Please let it be known that the League has their own agenda, members.
They also play the same tune as the i
Jim Lux wrote:
At 05:58 AM 1/19/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyo
At 05:58 AM 1/19/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyone with a signal g
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyone with a signal generator that's locked to a decent
reference, and
Eric Ellison wrote:
Folks
Just autta send this whole message thread to ARRL. It really is not that
much fun if the equipment you have evolved at great cost and enjoyment, is
FOO_BAR to the 'standard' being transmitted!
Jim, can't you convince JPL folks to send this test? It more or less is a
go
At 06:44 PM 1/18/2006, Eric Ellison wrote:
Folks
Just autta send this whole message thread to ARRL. It really is not that
much fun if the equipment you have evolved at great cost and enjoyment, is
FOO_BAR to the 'standard' being transmitted!
Jim, can't you convince JPL folks to send this test?
At 06:10 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> As I recall, you can measure the phase of a tone with an uncertainty of
> 1/sqrt(T * CNR), where T is the integration time, and CNR is the ca
N8UR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:11 PM
To: Jim Lux
Cc: Eric Ellison; 'Joe - AB1DO'; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT: one more win for the SDR-1000
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 0
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>
>> Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
>>
>> > Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment
>> than ARRL
>> > for generating the test?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
I missed the '05 FMT, had put the date down on my calendar but forgot to
adjust for UTC so was off by a day this year and missed it.
I did run the FMT in '03 and '04 calibrating a TS 2000 to WWV and CHU and
using Spectrum Lab for the analysis. Scored in the .01 to .04 ppm range -
respectable
At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
> Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment than ARRL
> for generating the test?
>
>
>
> Sort of would be fun for folks like yourself, Tom, JPL?, John or others,
> wit
At 04:01 PM 1/18/2006, you wrote:
Jim
You sure know how to rain on the parade LOL!
Naaah.. I think Jan got lucky and happened to measure when the
propagation was just right. And he corrected me, the computer was
an old PC his wife used to use.
Congrats Jan!
I talked with Bill KD5TFD
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
> Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment than ARRL
> for generating the test?
>
>
>
> Sort of would be fun for folks like yourself, Tom, JPL?, John or others,
> with access to millions of dollars in equipment to
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 06:40 PM:
> Spent some enjoyable time on John Ackerman's website today, looking at his
> time stuff and measurement set up. I wonder if he used the SDR-1000 with his
> laboratory?
We used the SDR-1000 as a monitor receiver since the technique we were
: Joe - AB1DO;
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT:
one more win for the SDR-1000
At 05:04 PM 1/18/2006, Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi all,
ARRL
held its Frequency Measurement Test on November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test
involved transmitting a single
dnesday, January 18, 2006
8:04 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT: one
more win for the SDR-1000
Hi all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on November 17 at
0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in SSB at a
predetermined carrie
At 05:04 PM 1/18/2006, Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi
all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on
November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in
SSB at a predetermined carrier frequency. The objective of the test was
to figure out the exact frequency of the tone W1AW was
Hi all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on
November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in SSB at
a predetermined carrier frequency. The objective of the test was to figure out
the exact frequency of the tone W1AW was transmitting.
I decided to give it a
Geeks can gitty up and go too:
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2005/DXPhone/
http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/2005/DXPhone.pdf
US-VE assisted SOAB: 7-th. I was tired and quit Sunday at noon, having
gotten 4 hours sleep the night before the contest and 3 hours sleep
durin
Jose
(Second Smile)
Eric - AA4SW
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of José Dumoulin
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL review and the D44
Hi Tom,
I agree
Jose
(smile)
Eric - AA4SW
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of José Dumoulin
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 3:51 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL review and the D44
Hi Gerald es All
The photo of the breakout box
Eric
Repost the picture, people are questioning documentation!
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 3:57 PM
To: 'José Dumoulin'; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL review a
Hi Tom,
I agree totally to share the prize with you and Ken.
73 - José
Tom Clark, W3IWI a écrit :
José Dumoulin wrote:
Hi Gerald es All
The photo of the breakout box shows an orange plug of the Hosa cable
going to out 1. Is it a test of our vigilance ? If yes, I won.
You aren't the sole
José Dumoulin wrote:
Hi Gerald es All
The photo of the breakout box shows an orange plug of the Hosa cable
going to out 1. Is it a test of our vigilance ? If yes, I won.
You aren't the sole winner, José -- I saw it too. What you see is the
secret patent-pending Hilbert Transformer used to
Yes. José and Ken both win the prize. ;) Remember: Orange plugs go in
the even numbered slots.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of José Dumoulin
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:51 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio
lector'
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL October SDR-1000 review online
We have posted the article (with permission) on our articles page.
There is also a link on our homepage under Announcements for your
convenience. The direct link is also below.
http://www.flex-radio.com/articles_files/20
Hi Gerald es All
The photo of the breakout box shows an orange plug of the Hosa cable
going to out 1. Is it a test of our vigilance ? If yes, I won.
73 - José F5JD
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken - N9VV
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:25 PM
To: FlexRadio Systems email reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL October SDR-1000 review online
CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
[members only]
http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510
ED] Behalf Of Ken - N9VV
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:25 PM
To: FlexRadio Systems email reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL October SDR-1000 review online
CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
[members only]
http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510.pdf
de Ken
day, August 29, 2005 3:25 PM
> To: FlexRadio Systems email reflector
> Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL October SDR-1000 review online
>
>
> CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
> [members only]
> http://www2.arrl.org/m
Me too!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Taft
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:32 PM
To: flexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL October SDR-1000 review online
>CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
>[member
CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
[members only]
http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510.pdf
de Ken
SNIFF! Makes me so damned proud that I own one.
Larry K2LT
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database:
CONGRATS Gerald, EricW, BobM, and FrankB
[members only]
http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510.pdf
de Ken
74 matches
Mail list logo
