On 10/2/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MS is also likely to continue to provide free tools for their
> platform, albeit typically only for the latest versions (e.g. I
> wouldn't count on VS2005 express editions still working in 2010.. the
> tools might work ok, but .NET will have evolved
Peter G. Viscarola wrote:
>
> ...which is exactly what Windows Erlang and cygwin/cygserver do
> already.
>
>
> Does Erlang/OTP have multiprocessor support on Windows yet? The last
> time I looked, it didn't.
>
> de Peter K1PGV
>
>
>
> ___
> FlexR
...which is exactly what Windows Erlang and cygwin/cygserver do
already.
Does Erlang/OTP have multiprocessor support on Windows yet? The last
time I looked, it didn't.
de Peter K1PGV
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail
At 12:36 PM 10/2/2007, Philip Covington wrote:
>On 10/2/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > MS is also likely to continue to provide free tools for their
> > platform, albeit typically only for the latest versions (e.g. I
> > wouldn't count on VS2005 express editions still working in 2010.
At 11:35 AM 10/2/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
>Jim Lux wrote:
>
> > ...One could
> > use Windows's extensive multithreaded and interprocess communications
> > capabilities...
>
>...which is exactly what Windows Erlang and cygwin/cygserver do
>already. I heartily exhort you to re-invent the wheel unto
Jim Lux wrote:
> ...One could
> use Windows's extensive multithreaded and interprocess communications
> capabilities...
...which is exactly what Windows Erlang and cygwin/cygserver do
already. I heartily exhort you to re-invent the wheel unto
perpetuity if that's what gives you a good time.
73
At 07:39 AM 10/2/2007, Frank Brickle wrote:
>Philip Covington wrote:
>
> > Will FSM be the basis for the talked about next generation
> > architecture of PowerSDR?
>
>Some version of it, most probably.
>
> > If so, how do you reconcile that most of
> > Flex's customers are Windows users, the 5000c
7 matches
Mail list logo
