Bill W5WVO wrote:
>I've been reading this board for a few weeks now, trying to decide if this is
>way I want to go for a new transceiver. I plan to use it with transverters
>primarily for VHF CW/SSB, but also on HF CW/SSB. Maybe digital modes later.
>Receive dynamic range is of the highest impo
I'm not sure the first part of your post is consistent
with the last.
If you want to set up a UHF/VHF station with
transverters, by definition you will need to do some
tinkering. If you use mast mounted preamps for
example you need to sequence T/R. Guess what the SDR
does this, it has built in
ps getting better and better with every new software
release.
-Tim
-
Integrated Technical Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill W5WVO
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:29 PM
To: [FlexRadio]
Subject: [Flexradio] Dumb newbi
rackball).
YMMV. Hope this helps.
Army Curtis - AE5P
Nacogdoches, the oldest town in Texas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill W5WVO
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:29 PM
To: [FlexRadio]
Subject: [Flexradio] Dumb newbie question -- but p
I've been reading this board for a few weeks now, trying to decide if this is
way I want to go for a new transceiver. I plan to use it with transverters
primarily for VHF CW/SSB, but also on HF CW/SSB. Maybe digital modes later.
Receive dynamic range is of the highest importance to me, because m
5 matches
Mail list logo
