On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 09:52 -0400, Robert McGwier wrote:
Bob Cowdery wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 19:20 -0500, KE5EUP wrote:
I'd like to have:
1. A platform independent GUI.
2. An IDE that makes GUI development nice (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
I think one should
I offered this code as an example of a 2.0 port. I bailed out on it in March,
since
it was very time consuming, and there was absolutely no resonance with
the folks on the reflector. It started as a kind of jigsaw project, just
sorting the pieces into object categories, would need to be
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 19:20 -0500, KE5EUP wrote:
I'd like to have:
1. A platform independent GUI.
2. An IDE that makes GUI development nice (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
I think one should consider in all this the push into distribution with
Erlang which frees up each node to be in the
IF you wanted to maximise the SDR1000 group participation in programming
I'd say that the design architecture is paramount and would lead onto
choosing the programming language(s) to suit the structure best.
As a family man with limited time for hobbies I'd like to be able to
develop a small
Could someone from the software team give us an update on the search
for the new set of tools. Does it look promising? Any estimate of
when might we be able to switch over (if ever)?
Jerry W4UK
At 03:37 10/18/2006, Ken Klein wrote:
Rick;
I'm waiting for the version that uses the free tools,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:12 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
Could someone from the software team give us an update on the search for
the new set
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:12 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
Could someone from the software team give us
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:12 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
Could someone from the software team give us an update on the search for
the new set of tools. Does it look promising
At 08:36 AM 10/18/2006, Tim Ellison wrote:
The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
I believe, that there is not going to be point in the future (if ever)
where PowerSDR 1.x will not be usable with the SDR-1000 hardware. Flex
has not
On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric wrote on 10/10/06
We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
the software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100%
on what those free tools will be, but right Visual Studio
On 10/18/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
I believe, that there is not going to be point in the future (if ever)
where PowerSDR 1.x will not be usable with the SDR-1000 hardware.
At 17:26 10/18/2006, you wrote:
Another think to think about is that someone could take up converting
PowerSDR console to work with .NET 2.0. Since C# Express is free,
someone could get started on this with no monetary investment in
development tools.
The other supporting library DLLs, like
At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
the problems with .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0 from there.
You will get well over 400 warnings and errors when you load
On 10/18/06, Bob Cowdery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:20 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric wrote on 10/10/06
We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
the software.
Covington
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexList
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
Fan)
...Sounds like the plan is the Console will stay in C#
though, using WinForms and .NET 2
]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Philip Covington
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexList
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
Fan)
...Sounds like the plan is the Console will stay in C#
though, using WinForms and .NET 2
On 10/18/06, Eric Wachsmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily. I would prefer to have a cross platform solution. I have
not evaluated Eclipse yet, but it sounds like it could be an alternative.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
I thought Eclipse was a development environment. Are
is, for all
practical purposes, Windows only.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: Philip Covington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 4:12 PM
To: Eric Wachsmann
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FlexList
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team
On 10/18/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
the problems with .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0 from there.
You will
At 01:36 PM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
On 10/18/06, Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
the problems
At 02:43 PM 10/18/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
I'd like to have:
1. A platform independent GUI.
2. An IDE that makes GUI development nice (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
I am not stuck on any tool or language at this point as I don't have enough
information to say, This is the best tool or This is the best
:00 PM
To: Eric Wachsmann; 'Philip Covington'
Cc: 'FlexList'
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
At 02:43 PM 10/18/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
I'd like to have:
1. A platform independent GUI.
2. An IDE that makes GUI development nice (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
I
At 04:10 PM 10/18/2006, Ken Klein wrote:
Jim;
Please excuse a really dumb question: Why NOT use Java??? Seems to me for
an Open Source project such as this, that would be the first choice.
Not a dumb question at all.
It would revolve around whether you want to have maximum portability
or
I have an uninformed question. What about Python?
Forgive the ignorance, I have a series of books and learning it is on my
short list this winter. The web site states and I quote below:
Python runs on Windows, Linux/Unix, Mac OS X, OS/2, Amiga, Palm
Handhelds, and Nokia mobile phones. Python
24 matches
Mail list logo
