Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-03 Thread Ian Wade G3NRW
From: Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 Time: 10:43:52 Ah, thank you for providing me with a soapbox for a pet peeve of mine. :-) Your chart is quite good. Thank you. Regardless, I would suggest losing the dial frequencies altogether. The problem is, dial-frequency is

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-03 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Ian Wade G3NRW g3...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Brian I agree with you entirely. It's only the emitted frequency that matters -- it doesn't matter how it is generated. I even said as much in the 30MDG reflector when I first questioned the tabular listing: That is

[Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Ian Wade G3NRW
Just in time for the 30m Multi Mode weekend -- 4/5 June 2011. A few weeks ago Don Hobson, KB9UMT, founder of the 30m Digital Group, published the updated unofficial 30m bandplan on the 30MDG reflector. I responded, saying that the listing was a little misleading, because some frequencies were

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Ian Wade G3NRW g3...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Just in time for the 30m Multi Mode weekend -- 4/5 June 2011. A few weeks ago Don Hobson, KB9UMT, founder of the 30m Digital Group, published the updated unofficial 30m bandplan on the 30MDG reflector. I responded,

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Peter G. Viscarola
SRI... this discussion probably isn't that relevant on this list, but... Your chart is quite good. Thank you. Regardless, I would suggest losing the dial frequencies altogether. As a very almost exclusively digi-mode operator, and only being a ham for 5 years or so, I have never

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter G. Viscarola pete...@osr.com wrote: SRI... this discussion probably isn't that relevant on this list, but... Your chart is quite good. Thank you. Regardless, I would suggest losing the dial frequencies altogether. As a very almost exclusively

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Lee Mushel
-radio.biz Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 4:44 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter G. Viscarola pete...@osr.com wrote: SRI... this discussion probably isn't that relevant on this list, but... Your chart is quite good

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Lee Mushel herbe...@centurytel.net wrote: You might consider the possibility that there is a reason why we continue to have FMT's! Or, maybe that some two-way communication is deliberate. People actually communicate? I thought all this was just for playing

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Fred Howell
, June 02, 2011 5:45 PM To: Peter G. Viscarola Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter G. Viscarola pete...@osr.com wrote: SRI... this discussion probably isn't that relevant on this list

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Fred Howell fhowell...@att.net wrote: It could be because most hams use radios with actual dials that display the frequency. Digital modes aren't exclusive to Flex radios. But that frequency on the VFO is NOT the frequency of your emission. Try running a

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian
On 6/2/2011 06:56 AM, Ian Wade G3NRW wrote: Just in time for the 30m Multi Mode weekend -- 4/5 June 2011. A few weeks ago Don Hobson, KB9UMT, founder of the 30m Digital Group, published the updated unofficial 30m bandplan on the 30MDG reflector. I responded, saying that the listing was a

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Fred Howell
@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Fred Howell fhowell...@att.net wrote: It could be because most hams use radios with actual dials that display the frequency. Digital modes aren't exclusive to Flex radios

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Bill
, 2011 7:13 PM To: Fred Howell Cc: Peter G. Viscarola; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Fred Howellfhowell...@att.net wrote: It could be because most hams use radios with actual dials that display

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Tony Estep
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Brian n...@comcast.net wrote: ...What about the annoying beacon on 10.125? I too hear a signal on 10.125, but it turned out not to be a beacon. After much experimentation, I found that it's coming from my wireless router. With some further tweaking,

Re: [Flexradio] The 30m Band Utilization Chart -- 2 June 2011

2011-06-02 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Fred Howell fhowell...@att.net wrote: All that is quite true, but too many of us fail to understand that. It is still the “dial frequency” whether it has little to do with the emissions frequencies or not. I have attempted to explain that to some appliance