On 10/11/06, Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip Covington wrote:
> > On 10/11/06, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
> >>
> >>> Phil Covington wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away
Philip Covington wrote:
> On 10/11/06, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Covington wrote:
>>>
>>> "A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away from
>>> straight
>>> line procedural code."
>>>
>>> As an OLD
On 10/11/06, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
> >Phil Covington wrote:
> >
> >"A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away from
> >straight
> >line procedural code."
> >
> >As an OLD machine language programmer, I am of the imp
At 06:44 AM 10/11/2006, Jim, W4ATK wrote:
>Phil Covington wrote:
>
>"A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away from
>straight
>line procedural code."
>
>As an OLD machine language programmer, I am of the impression that "straight
>line" code increases the speed of the pa
Phil Covington wrote:
"A lot of the perceived need for threading goes away when you get away from
straight
line procedural code."
As an OLD machine language programmer, I am of the impression that "straight
line" code increases the speed of the particular routine(s) avoiding those
heavy far calls
On 10/11/06, Paul Shaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you have said below is mostly true for the current UI class design,
> which I think should be abandoned.
> You are concerned about issues that shouldn't even come up, but are due to a
> less than optimum overall
> class design. The pesky
06 4:36 PM
> To: Eric Wachsmann
> Cc: 'Flex-radio Reflector'
> Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Vs2003 vis a vis Vista
>
> At 02:03 PM 10/10/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
> >Those are in our source. Look in the root\trunk\Source\Console\Invoke\
> >folder for the defin
All Right!! That's great news!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Jim Lux'
Cc: 'Flex-radio Reflector'
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Vs200
At 02:48 PM 10/10/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>Actually, based on my research, they didn't fix this in .NET v2.0. You
>still have to do the recommended workarounds they suggest for .NET v1.1 when
>accessing GUI controls from a thread other than the one that created them in
>order to avoid random c
aven't seen any mention of whether they have addressed this in .NET v3.0.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 4:36 PM
> To: Eric Wachsmann
> Cc: 'Flex-radio Reflector'
>
At 02:03 PM 10/10/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>Those are in our source. Look in the root\trunk\Source\Console\Invoke\
>folder for the definitions. These are basically wrappers on the existing
>GUI controls that incorporate Thread Safe mechanisms. Why this is not a
>defined property on the contro
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Vs2003 vis a vis Vista
"We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of the
software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100% on what
those free tools will be, but right Visual Studio 2005 Express versions are
looking to b
That's great! That should attract a lot more volunteer code
contributor/maintainers.
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 11:42, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
> We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of the
> software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS.
save many programmers some headaches.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Lux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 3:52 PM
> To: Eric Wachsmann
> Cc: 'Flex-radio Reflector'
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Vs2003
At 09:42 AM 10/10/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of the
>software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100% on what
>those free tools will be, but right Visual Studio 2005 Express versions are
>looking to be the bes
half Of Mike Naruta
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:29 AM
> To: Jim Lux
> Cc: Flex-radio Reflector
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Vs2003 vis a vis Vista
>
> Thanks Jim. I was hoping to hear from the developers
> whether the re-write would be the same, or whether
> the to
Thanks Jim. I was hoping to hear from the developers
whether the re-write would be the same, or whether
the tools I would have to buy would be useless on
the new PowerSDR.
Mike - AA8K
Jim Lux wrote:
> At 06:10 AM 10/8/2006, Mike Naruta wrote:
>> I bought my SDR-1000 a year-and-a-half ago. I
At 06:10 AM 10/8/2006, Mike Naruta wrote:
>I bought my SDR-1000 a year-and-a-half ago. I got
>e
>Maybe it's time to break down and try to find and
>buy Visual Studio 2003.
>
>Is the re-write still going to be in Visual Studio 2003?
>
>Is that going to work with Vista?
Sort of..
.net 1.1 and VS200
18 matches
Mail list logo
