I' tweaked my equalizer settings while calling TO5JF (St. Barts).
The output of my MFJ DVK was too low compaired to using the Heil ProSet mic.
Duh, read the instructions and adjusted output pot to equal ProSet mic.
Got the St. Barts 2 calls later.
I found just the slightest uptic on 500 2K
when the new architecture is realized.
Edwin MarzanAB2VW From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Date:
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:32:03 -0600 Subject: [Flexradio] audio punch I' tweaked
my equalizer settings while calling TO5JF (St. Barts). The output of my MFJ
DVK was too low compaired
conditions.
73, Pete N3EVL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Edwin Marzan
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 3:08 PM
To: FireBrick; FlexRadio List
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch (SVN 1879) - K6JCA Console
I wrote here a few
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stig Rasmussen
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:28 PM
To: Ahti Aintila; Dale Boresz
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Hello, please stop this. :-)
I dont want any discussion around ESSB / and or DX
Stig and Jim,
Dale is telling the plain truth, if your main interest is getting your
signal through in noisy conditions and DX pileups. The basses convey
very little speach information, but eat up the limited power of your
transmitter. Unless you want to broadcast a Hi-Fi music program on ham
used. Thats it! If there is an explanation I would like to
hear...
Stig
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Ahti Aintila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. juni 2007 10:26
Til: Dale Boresz
Kopi: Jim McLester; flexradio@flex-radio.biz; Stig Rasmussen
Emne: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Stig and Jim
Aintila; Dale Boresz
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Hello, please stop this. :-)
I dont want any discussion around ESSB / and or DX-pileups modulation. Whats
best etc.
My point is only to state the fact that SDR-1000 handle bass-less modulation
much
less punchy than
Same here, recording studio guy / ham op down the street sees the same on my
rig.
Jim - W4YXU
- Original Message -
From: Stig Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
I tried much different
] audio punch
I tried much different settings with external audio processing.
I mostly run ESSB with much bass. Then the talk power is really good. My
watt-meter (Daiwa CN-101L)peaks around 50-60W on normal speaking, with
external audio gear.
If i try to get a squeeky (thin) dx-modulation
...
Edwin Marzan
AB2VW
From: Chris Maukonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] audio punch
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:46:00 -0400
Interesting thread. I currently use a small mixer for my mic preamp with
a nano compressor
set
Edwin Marzan wrote:
I'm thinking that any type of external processing will eventually be
matched wth a software version. It is just a matter of time before we
will all have these capabilites built in. It would be interesting to
know the make and model of the unit you are using to enhance
My findings with SDR-X SVN:1209. I work 6 meter weak signal stuff. I want/need,
on SSB, audio that is very penatrating but not distorted.
I have a Remote Base (SDR) 17 mile from me, thanks to W4MO. I have spent many
hours listening to myself, watch the Panadapter on the Remote Base and
Two years ago before we redid the transmitter from the ground up to
produce a larger punch audio chain, and have all of the stages metered,
the compander was being overdriven by stages in front of it. There was
an ad hoc scaling added by me to keep it from overdriving the stages
beyond it, in
Great job. Audio punch is much improved!
Farnk, WA3JBT
- Original Message -
From: Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Nancy Ridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
Two years ago before we redid
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20070531/fef9cc03/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
My experience of listening to the SDR1000 on the air is also that there
is no audio punch. I keep a sked with a ZS every Friday over quite a
difficult polar path. He has two radios, one an old analogue rig with
an RF clipper, and the other an SDR1000. When the path is especially
difficult,
Hi
for all interested increase the audio performance in his SDR1K,
please look at this VE3NEA software: http://www.dxatlas.com/vshaper/
I use it with the on board audio of my P4, placing the out to input of
my FA66, with outstanding performance: EQ/RFclipper/Gate.
If you have Firebox, you can
: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20
070531/fef9cc03/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz
Frank Mayer wrote:
I wonder if this type of circuit CAN be written in
software.
Hi Frank,
Indeed it can. In my previous employment we used one that was written
in DSP assembler for the 56002 (not by me unfortunately, although I did
give the algorithm inputs). It was very effective.
Hi Greg et al,
FINALLY! Ihave been waiting for 4 years that other flexers start get
interested. As an old hardware man I have been talking about RF
clipping alot. I want to admit that the time of this method is over
already during this SDR era, but that function in the more
sophisticated software
Hi,
Well, it seems to me that if VE3NEA can do it, then the FlexRadio
software engineers can too. I do have a FireBox. so I will try it per below.
73, Chas W1CG
At 04:30 AM 5/31/2007, Giuseppe Campana wrote:
Hi
for all interested increase the audio performance in his SDR1K,
please look at
Chas,
Of course the Flex Radio programmers can do it. But, I am certain that just
like software projects at my soon-to-be former job, there is a very large list
of things they want to do a list of things that MUST be done 1st to meet a
deadline, such as getting the code ready for the
Thank God ...I thought I was the only one that thought Comp/Compndr was
way lacking! (as well as the ANF).
I know alota folks don't need or want anything other than Communication
Audio...and after talking with 100's of hams on the air...I see their
point.
It's usually wasted on people listening
: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
At 07:12 PM 5/30/2007, Larry W8ER wrote:
Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
performance of a simple external
Larry W8ER wrote:
Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
performance of a simple external hardware preamp and compressor
At 01:33 AM 5/31/2007, Frank Mayer wrote:
I am in agreement with you Greg as far as the clipper goes. Some of the
other posts so far are saying to use external gear. That's ok for the
audio boys but an RF Clipper is a different animal. I don't believe
anyone is manufacturing an external unit
series,
Kenwood TS-870, Icom ProIII)
- Original Message -
From: Jim Lux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frank Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg - ZL3IX [EMAIL PROTECTED];
flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
At 01:33 AM 5/31/2007, Frank Mayer
]
To: Greg - ZL3IX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Audio Punch
Hi Greg et al,
FINALLY! Ihave been waiting for 4 years that other flexers start get
interested. As an old hardware man I have been talking about RF
At 08:28 AM 5/31/2007, Frank Mayer wrote:
I guess Yaesu was one of the pioneers of RF speech processing way back in
the early 70's with the Ft-101 series of transceivers. The way that these
RF Processors work is they convert the audio from the mic input to RF with a
SSB generator. They use
If you have not looked at VE3NEA Vshaper, you should !
It is instructive to just play with it outside of the SDR. It includes
a build in recorder loop that lets you listen to the result as you
adjust the setting ( both with and without QRN QRM ).
With the SDR, you can select the Vshaper
I would like to jump in and ask about real-world measurements. From
what I hear on the air, most guys rely on the *totally subjective*
assessment of another Ham to tell them about their audio. This is
great if the Receiving Ham is a talented audiophile but what about
his *hearing*, his
I use another receiver with headphones...mostly a 746Pro
and when I wanna hear what my other radios sound like...I use the flex
with headphones as the receiver
as someone said earlier today Good is Subjective ...
Its chevys and fords man
steve
kw5tx
Ken N9VV wrote:
I would like to jump
I have had my SDR-1000 for about 6 months now and I am very happy with it for
the most part. After all is said and done the only criticism that I really
have of the rig is the performance of the Compressor. What is this function
actually? I have tried all versions of the Power SDR software
Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
performance of a simple external hardware preamp and compressor with the
built in
At 07:12 PM 5/30/2007, Larry W8ER wrote:
Frank ... everyone that I know that is serious about audio and owns a
Flex is using external processing for exactly the reason that you are
inquiring about. I have been absolutely unable to get close to the
performance of a simple external hardware preamp
35 matches
Mail list logo
