Robert McGwier wrote:
> Ignacio:
>
> This is even stranger. Where the calibration is done in the code is in
> console.cs There are NO differences between John Eckerts console.cs
> calibration and the "official" console.cs in svn 807.
>
I got the code module wrong, but the idea right. I ca
Ignacio:
This is even stranger. Where the calibration is done in the code is in
console.cs There are NO differences between John Eckerts console.cs
calibration and the "official" console.cs in svn 807.
I am going to make the usual horrible recommendation.But first I
would love for us to
Hi Bob,
This problem can be better described as a power miscalculation when
polyphase is on. No matter how the calibration is done, selecting
polyphase the disply shows 3 dB high.
I just loaded svn 807X, by John_Eckert to test the BCI feature (I live
quite close to several BC xmts) and this ve
Robert McGwier wrote:
> Ignacio:
>
> I am sorry you are having a problem with it. I just put the code on
> my signal generator (8640B). I tested every buffer size, audio and
> dsp, with and without polyphase display. The results were identical
> to the tenth dB on the meter and the same pix
Ignacio:
I am sorry you are having a problem with it. I just put the code on my
signal generator (8640B). I tested every buffer size, audio and dsp,
with and without polyphase display. The results were identical to the
tenth dB on the meter and the same pixel on the display. Are you usin
Ignacio Cembreros escribió:
>> Robert McGwier wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It does. I had an embarassing faux pas in the polyphase power
>>> spectral calculation. This is the cause of it working for some
>>> people and not for others and varying with dsp sizes, etc.
>>>
>>> I had normalized the wi
> Robert McGwier wrote:
>
>> It does. I had an embarassing faux pas in the polyphase power
>> spectral calculation. This is the cause of it working for some
>> people and not for others and varying with dsp sizes, etc.
>>
>> I had normalized the window filter incorrectly for polyphase.
>>
Hmm. I am having problems with my out going gmail now. I can't seem to
win.
Robert McGwier wrote:
> It does. I had an embarassing faux pas in the polyphase power
> spectral calculation. This is the cause of it working for some
> people and not for others and varying with dsp sizes, etc.
>
It does. I had an embarassing faux pas in the polyphase power spectral
calculation. This is the cause of it working for some people and not
for others and varying with dsp sizes, etc.
I had normalized the window filter incorrectly for polyphase.
73's and HNY to all,
Bob
N4HY
Trevor Smithe
The latest SVN (802) appears to have fixed the problem.
73 to all
Trevor G0KTN
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%
From: root [knesbitt] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:55 PM
> To: Eric Wachsmann
> Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] v1.9.0 Level Calibration
>
> Eric,
> what happens if you attempt to run the cal routine on a fresh install
7;m
> not sure what's going on.
>
>
> Eric Wachsmann
> FlexRadio Systems
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> radio.biz] On Behalf Of root [knesbitt]
>> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:59 PM
>
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of root [knesbitt]
> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 3:59 PM
> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
> Subject: [Flexradio] v1.9.0 Level Calibration
>
> Is it me or is the input level
Is it me or is the input level calibration out by 3 dB in v1.9.0 (795)?
Dumping a -70 dBm into the front end of the SDR (HP 8648C derived)
equates to -67.0 dBm repeatedly for Pre-amp Gain settings of "low/Med/High".
Using a new .mdb for this load and have run the Cal routine after
ensuring the r
14 matches
Mail list logo
