On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 22:16, Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Berndt) [2002.05.30 20:45]:
I have not been keeping track of changes on the JSBSim XML formats for
several months, so I'll try to update the -180 definitions tonight and
see what happens. I will let you know if
Andy Ross writes:
First, the air pressures returned from the environment system don't
agree with the standard atmosphere that YASim uses to do its
calibration. They match pretty well at sea level, but diverge as
altitude increase. At 35000 feet, they're too low by 20%, which is
Andy Ross writes:
Nonetheless, I think I found the problem. In converting the YASim
table to the new format, its values were re-encoded as deltas from sea
level conditions, with sea level pressure defined as 29.92 inches of
mercury. But in the FGEnvironment constructor, I see the
Keith, unfortunately Eric's instructions weren't quite right :(
Erik Hofman wrote:
Just do ./configure
this will give a full list of the possibilities.
He meant
./configure --help
of course :)
Yours is: --disable-logging
Actually, it is --without-logging:
./configure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith, unfortunately Eric's instructions weren't quite right :(
Erik Hofman wrote:
Just do ./configure
this will give a full list of the possibilities.
He meant
./configure --help
of course :)
Yours is: --disable-logging
Actually, it is
Matt,
I've been looking at the comparitive high price of good quality analogue yokes and I
wondered how difficult it would be to make my own and if anyone here has made one?
I figured that there might be a place that I could buy an old yoke and shaft from a
Cessna, Piper or similar and
On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:37:16 -0700 (PDT),
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE. I'm using it with two 17 flat
panels. The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.
..hmmm. Have you tried it under Linux? Mandrake 8.2 or
Red
David Megginson wrote:
The idea is that users should be able to set any reasonable sea-level
pressure and see reasonable behaviour -- that's why I set the tables
up with deltas rather than absolute values. I can see, now, how that
would be a problem at higher altitudes, but what should we
If memory serves, it's a Radeon VE. I'm using it with two 17 flat
panels. The machine is a Dell dual P4 running Win2k.
..hmmm. Have you tried it under Linux? Mandrake 8.2 or
Red Hat 7.3 may be a better choise to support the card,
considering ATI's policy towards XFree86.org and
I've just finished a comprehensive, step-by-step guided tutorial for
creating FlightGear scenery using only DEM-30 (or DEM-3), the
default.apt.gz file, and one of the four vmap0 CD-ROMs (the tutorial
explains what you need to download and where you can find it).
The tutorial is temporarily
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm pretty sure we're seeing the same behavior here, actually. I'll
With Dave's change to prefrences.xml I can get up to FL320 before running into
trouble. Really tried to go higher...no luck.
take a look at the reduction in climb performance, but I'm
Jim Wilson writes:
In any case, flying very carefully I can barely get it up to FL320
with the change in preferences.xml. Going further just doesn't
seem possible. I tried serveral AoAs and just couldn't get it to
go up much without falling back.
What happens when you reduce the fuel
Andy Ross wrote:
David Megginson wrote:
The idea is that users should be able to set any reasonable sea-level
pressure and see reasonable behaviour -- that's why I set the tables
up with deltas rather than absolute values. I can see, now, how that
would be a problem at higher
Jim Wilson said:
Hi Thomas,
A couple questions below.
Thomas Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The CLB and CON (max. continuous thrust) you mentioned above (and the
other
two modes CRZ and TO/GA) are just limits. This means, that they set an
upper
limit on how much thrust will be
Hello James,
[I assume Thomas will reply anyway, but I want to check I have this
right (from using the PMDG 757/767/777s which are supposed to be just
about the most accurate systems models out there)]
On the FMC, one of the pages is THRUST LIM (actually there's a couple).
This is where
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What happens when you reduce the fuel load?
Hmmm...nothing because it won't reduce. I'm showing full 19k+ lbs for three
tanks no matter what I do with the fraction figure in the config and can't
dump during flight it either.
Reducing the tank capacity
On Fri, 31 May 2002 13:51:49 -0700
Dave Tessman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any interest in space flight simulation out there?
I don't think it's ruled out, at all. There are at least
two issues I can see:
1) FlightGear might have to modify the visuals approach it
is currently using
On Fri, 31 May 2002 19:20:30 -,
Thomas Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
004101c208d8$3be70830$fe78a8c0@private:
Jim Wilson said:
Hi Thomas,
A couple questions below.
Thomas Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Are the CLB and CRZ preset to a
given thrust? And CON is
18 matches
Mail list logo
