Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug-Report for FGFS v0.8.0

2002-11-15 Thread Roland Häder
Hello, I got this from ldd command: libmk4.so.0 = /usr/lib/libmk4.so.0 (0x4003c000) libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40081000) libglut.so.3 = /usr/lib/libglut.so.3 (0x4009) libGL.so.1 = /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x400c8000) libXmu.so.6 =

[Flightgear-devel] Bug-Report for v0.8.0 - self-fixed ;)

2002-11-15 Thread Roland Häder
Hello again! Well, I fix it up with help from Andy Ross: The new metakit lib is installed to /usr/local/lib/ but there's also a metakit lib at /usr/lib/. So I simply removed the old /usr/lib/libmk4.so* and it's working now. Thanks. But what about fixing-out some compiler warnings? Roland

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug-Report for FGFS v0.8.0

2002-11-15 Thread Martin Spott
Hmmm, for it seems he hasn't linked any metakit library? He did: libmk4.so.0 = /usr/lib/libmk4.so.0 (0x4003c000) Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] gear compression

2002-11-15 Thread Andy Ross
Jim Wilson wrote: What do the gear/compression-norm values in YASim represent? Is it a distance or travel range fraction or something else? It's a normalized value -- a fraction. A value of 0 represents full extension, 1 is full compression. The actual length numbers can be gotten from the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug-Report for FGFS v0.8.0

2002-11-15 Thread Andy Ross
Roland Häder wrote: But what about fixing-out some compiler warnings? Most of those appeared with gcc 3.2, I believe. They don't look too scary to me -- mostly C++ standardization stuff. I'm sure they'll be fixed soon. Scanning through it quickly, it looks like mostly David's code. Sloppy

Re: [Flightgear-devel] gear compression

2002-11-15 Thread Jim Wilson
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson wrote: What do the gear/compression-norm values in YASim represent? Is it a distance or travel range fraction or something else? It's a normalized value -- a fraction. A value of 0 represents full extension, 1 is full compression. The

[Flightgear-devel] 172P Progress

2002-11-15 Thread David Megginson
I've been doing a little more work on the 172p interior. When this plane gets well enough along, I'm going to suggest making it the default startup plane (in the 3D version): http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/c172p-int-01.png http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/c172p-int-02.png