[Flightgear-devel] aero-matic

2003-06-14 Thread paul mccann
David This is a great idea for folks like me, I have been working on a twin otter by hacking the dc3 jbsim config file. I have only had limited sucess so hope you do this, looks great so far. Paul ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Transition textures and ABs??

2003-06-14 Thread Erik Hofman
Matevz Jekovec wrote: Also, I've noticed F16 has afterburners... are these far away for FlightGear? Afterburner is already modeled for the F16. If your throttle passes 75% afterburner kicks in. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

[Flightgear-devel] Transition textures and ABs??

2003-06-14 Thread Matevz Jekovec
I wonder if there are any ideas (MSFS, Combat FS, Flanker, LO-MAC, Fly!) how to make transition textures between two areas like on this shot taken from F4: http://www.falcon5.nl/download/film/falcon4/widmak.zip Also, I've noticed F16 has afterburners... are these far away for FlightGear? - M

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A320 progress

2003-06-14 Thread Matevz Jekovec
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Just an update on the A320 model : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png Ailerons, Flaps, Rudder, Elevator are animated. Still have to make the landing gear and animate it. Several part of the

[Flightgear-devel] A320 progress

2003-06-14 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Just an update on the A320 model : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png Ailerons, Flaps, Rudder, Elevator are animated. Still have to make the landing gear and animate it. Several part of the texture are taken from t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737 panel

2003-06-14 Thread Darren Hammond
Not directly to do with the panel, but I when I used it, I noticed that the magnetic heading shows values between -15 and 0 when the heading is between 345 and 0. Darren On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:00:58AM -0500, David Culp wrote: > Here's a first stab at a glass cockpit for the 737. My goal is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] gone for a week

2003-06-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:20:40 -0500, "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If anyone cares, I am going to be out of town (and country) for the up > coming week. I have no idea what kind of net/email access I'll have > available... probably something, but I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] gone for a week

2003-06-14 Thread Jim Wilson
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It looks like it will be a very beautiful spot and the sun won't set > the entire time I'm there which will be a bit strange. (You can fast > forward time and watch the sun also not set in FlightGear which is > kind of fun.) It get's pretty close to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 64-Bit Question

2003-06-14 Thread Erik Hofman
Gopal Mor wrote: Solution : Use pragma pack(n) That won't work on all compilers. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737 panel

2003-06-14 Thread Innis Cunningham
Thanks David Will have a look at it. cheers Innis From: David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "flightgear-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] 737 panel Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:00:58 -0500 Here's a first stab at a gl

[Flightgear-devel] gone for a week

2003-06-14 Thread Curtis L. Olson
If anyone cares, I am going to be out of town (and country) for the up coming week. I have no idea what kind of net/email access I'll have available... probably something, but I doubt I'll be able to respond to much (if any) FlightGear related email until after I return. I'll be in Tromso, Norway

[Flightgear-devel] 64-Bit Question

2003-06-14 Thread Gopal Mor
Jonathan Polley wrote: > Now that 64-bit processors are becoming more available, does anyone know > of any problems that FlightGear may have running on a 64-bit processor > (Opteron or PowerPC 970)? I am assuming that those areas that would be > sensitive to data sizes (i.e., file formats) are saf