re: [Flightgear-devel] FGEnvironment [not] vs. WeatherCM

2002-02-23 Thread tcpip
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, David Megginson wrote: Christian -- I'm developing my own weather DB in a separate stream (--with-new-environment) partly to give you and others a chance to integrate your code. If you can tie it in to the rest of FlightGear (including the FDMs), I'll happily stop my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New subsystem: FGEnvironment

2002-02-22 Thread tcpip
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, David Megginson wrote: 2. conversion from raw form to a source independent format stored either in memory, or a persistent format Yes, if you mean METAR parsing and the like. Yes, that's what I meant. I'll probably isolate that behind a generic interface, so that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New subsystem: FGEnvironment

2002-02-21 Thread tcpip
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Just like we have competing FDM's with different focus, strengths and weaknesses, I don't think it is bad to have competing weather/environment management systems with different focus, strengths and weaknesses. When you say weather/environment

Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-07 Thread tcpip
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, David Megginson wrote: Andy Ross writes: the C310 has counter-rotating engines (therefore no p-factor) It does? Oops. I gotta get that fixed. The YASim model has identical engines; I thought that most of the simple twins had co-rotating engines, because