Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-16 Thread Durk Talsma
Hey Guys, I just got back from Canada yesterday, so I didn't have the time to respond any sooner. On Saturday 12 November 2005 03:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Dave Culp wrote: Due to underwhelming response to my previous post concerning a test run of 0.9.9-pre2, I'll repost now. Here is the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-12 Thread Martin Spott
Dave Culp wrote: Dent: .Dent: ..Dent: EHAMopening [...] I don't know what the Dent stuff is. I think tis is Directory ENTry. There is a . in this subdir, there is a .. and there is EHAM :-) Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !

[Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-11 Thread Dave Culp
Due to underwhelming response to my previous post concerning a test run of 0.9.9-pre2, I'll repost now. Here is the console output while running the F-16: Dent: .Dent: ..Dent: EHAMopening file: /home/dave/FlightGear-0.9.9-pre2/data/Navaids/carrier_nav.dat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-11 Thread George Patterson
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 20:17 -0600, Dave Culp wrote: Due to underwhelming response to my previous post concerning a test run of 0.9.9-pre2, I'll repost now. Here is the console output while running the F-16: Dent: .Dent: ..Dent: EHAMopening file:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-11 Thread Dave Culp
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:31 pm, George Patterson wrote: /home/dave/FlightGear-0.9.9-pre2/data/Aircraft/c172r/Models/c172-dpm.ac Does this file exist? It exists in CVS data, but not in 0.9.9-pre2 data. I think the underlying question is the more interesting one. Why is FG trying to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.9.9 repost

2005-11-11 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Dave Culp wrote: Due to underwhelming response to my previous post concerning a test run of 0.9.9-pre2, I'll repost now. Here is the console output while running the F-16: Dent: .Dent: ..Dent: EHAMopening I can get rid of the Dent ... debugging output in Airport/simple.cxx which