Re: [Flightgear-devel] Declarations and compilers

2004-03-09 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon Berndt wrote: Are there any reasons to choose one method over the other in the declaration of local variables that are used each frame? Here are some examples. Note that this hypothetical routine would be called each pass through the EOM (for example): = Method 2)

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Declarations and compilers

2004-03-09 Thread Jon Berndt
Jon Berndt wrote: Are there any reasons to choose one method over the other in the declaration of local variables that are used each frame? Here are some examples. Note that this hypothetical routine would be called each pass through the EOM (for example): =

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Declarations and compilers

2004-03-09 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Jon, I guess that you will know the final outcome of my opinion, but I will now tell in detail why: On Dienstag, 9. März 2004 03:52, Jon Berndt wrote: Are there any reasons to choose one method over the other in the declaration of local variables that are used each frame? Yep. I want to

[Flightgear-devel] Declarations and compilers

2004-03-08 Thread Jon Berndt
Are there any reasons to choose one method over the other in the declaration of local variables that are used each frame? Here are some examples. Note that this hypothetical routine would be called each pass through the EOM (for example): = Method 1) MyClass::Calculate(double xyz) {

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Declarations and compilers

2004-03-08 Thread Norman Vine
Jon Berndt writes: Are there any reasons to choose one method over the other in the declaration of local variables that are used each frame? Here are some examples. Note that this hypothetical routine would be called each pass through the EOM (for example): following use local