Re: [Flightgear-devel] ILS/Runway Heading

2002-01-23 Thread Curtis L. Olson
John Wojnaroski writes: > Hi, > > Looking thru Robin Peel's database I notice that runway headings in the ILS > file are given as true headings as > > I ILS KLAX 06L 108.50 082.92 33.952390 -118.399094 ... > I ILS KLAX 06R 111.70 082.92 33.950486 -118.398768 ... > I ILS KLAX 07L 111.10

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ILS/Runway Heading

2002-01-23 Thread John Wojnaroski
> > This appears to be what happened. The airplane was on an intercept heading, then > when the loc was captured it then turned to the obs heading and departed the loc > (crossing back thru it without actually trying to track it). > > I can't comment on the original question of where the correcti

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ILS/Runway Heading

2002-01-23 Thread jj
Ralph Jones wrote: > At 07:28 PM 1/22/2002 -0800, you wrote: > > >Ralph Jones wrote: > > > > > >ride! The autopilot turned to the selected heading and departed the already > >captured LOC as I recall hearing it. > > Come to think of it, that does make sense with a coupled autopilot: it > woul

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ILS/Runway Heading

2002-01-23 Thread Ralph Jones
At 07:28 PM 1/22/2002 -0800, you wrote: >Ralph Jones wrote: > > > > The setting of the OBS is immaterial on an ILS, because it does not work > > like a VOR... > > > >Actually (and much to my surprise) in some airplanes (for example the 737) it >apparently does matter. > >I don't recall the detai

[Flightgear-devel] ILS/Runway Heading

2002-01-21 Thread John Wojnaroski
Hi, Looking thru Robin Peel's database I notice that runway headings in the ILS file are given as true headings as I ILS KLAX 06L 108.50 082.92 33.952390 -118.399094 ... I ILS KLAX 06R 111.70 082.92 33.950486 -118.398768 ... I ILS KLAX 07L 111.10 082.93 33.940199 -118.376567 ... o