Re: [Flightgear-devel] Other segfaults -- the same? (was Re: segfault in AI code)

2004-10-22 Thread David Luff
On 10/21/04 at 12:19 PM Chris Metzler wrote: > >Here's what I see from gdb . . . > > < snip > > >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 3690)] >0x080b0705 in FGTower::ProcessDownwindReport (this=0xd041ee8, t=0xd87d8c8) >at AIPlane.hxx:80 >80

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Other segfaults -- the same? (was Re: segfault in AI code)

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:55:24 +0100 "David Luff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uggh, that's me in the firing line then! I haven't added any features > or code to the AI-traffic system for quite a while, probably pre-0.9.5. > I thought I had all the bugs worked out, but it seems not :-( It's bee

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Other segfaults -- the same? (was Re: segfault in AI code)

2004-10-21 Thread David Luff
On 10/21/04 at 9:52 AM David Culp wrote: >> I'm getting segfaults that seem related to the AI subsystem. They occur >> when I turn AI traffic on through the menu. They seem more frequent >> as I turn the AI traffic density up from 1 to 3. But they don't occur >> promptly upon start; instead,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Other segfaults -- the same? (was Re: segfault in AI code)

2004-10-21 Thread David Culp
> I'm getting segfaults that seem related to the AI subsystem. They occur > when I turn AI traffic on through the menu. They seem more frequent > as I turn the AI traffic density up from 1 to 3. But they don't occur > promptly upon start; instead, they almost always occur when I'm on final > for

[Flightgear-devel] Other segfaults -- the same? (was Re: segfault in AI code)

2004-10-21 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:06:14 -0500 David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Just downloaded a fresh CVS FlightGear and found that the AI code is >> causing segfaults now. I'll recompile and run it through gdb. In the >> mean time beware that some aircraft that set up AI scenarios by >> default