Mathias Fröhlich
Hi,
On Sonntag 17 Juli 2005 10:16, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Before we do any rework of the MP code, it works as is in 0.9.8 (with
some
bugs), but it is fundamentally broken in CVS. In cvs the received
aircraft
are displayed close to the observer, rather than in their
Vivian Meazza wrote:
This patch does not work for Cygwin. I'm not sure if Multiplayer ever worked
under Cygwin.
Norman Vine did a bit of quick diagnosis last night, and came up with a
cause and a fix. Apparently Linux uses 4 bytes while Cygwin uses 8 as
standard.
Apperantly gcc under
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
Apperantly gcc under cygwin uses a different alignment for structs
than gcc under linux (I don't know which gcc version is used under
cygwin). At home I use gcc 3.3.6, and it reports:
Yet another reason why blasting raw structures out an I/O channel
(especially a
Hi,
On Sonntag 17 Juli 2005 10:16, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Before we do any rework of the MP code, it works as is in 0.9.8 (with some
bugs), but it is fundamentally broken in CVS. In cvs the received aircraft
are displayed close to the observer, rather than in their proper locations.
It works
Mathias Fröhlich
On Sonntag 17 Juli 2005 10:16, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Before we do any rework of the MP code, it works as is in 0.9.8 (with
some
bugs), but it is fundamentally broken in CVS. In cvs the received
aircraft
are displayed close to the observer, rather than in their proper
On Sonntag 24 Juli 2005 19:51, Vivian Meazza wrote:
That's got to be better than broken. Shame it's not backward compatible
though. Let's get it into cvs then we can move forward.
Norman Vine came up with some modified code over on the IRC channel:
globals-get_multiplayer_tx_mgr()-
On July 24, 2005 01:08 pm, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Since the fg_server only forwards the network packets without looking into
them, this will still work with that code.
It would appear that fg_server is doing more than merely forwarding network
packets now. Those who are using your patch are
Mathias
Hi,
this is a very good idea IMO.
I was thinking about a very similar approach but never had the time and
not
yet the actual need to follow that.
If you do something like that, you might take care for the MATHWORKS guys
which use the network code like it is at the moment. So
