> You might want to take a look at the code yourself, I don't have the answers
> off the top of my head. But one suggestion: How about enhancing the
> interface by allowing the JSBSim-side to FGFS-side property mappings to be
> defined in the JSBSim configuration file?
If we are talking about t
Jon S Berndt said:
> For JSBSim (and I imagine, YASim, and others), our turbine model (for
> example) features various temperatures that can be reported on a panel
> display. For any unique aircraft, as well, there will be some
> arbitrary number of engines, with controls associated with each
For JSBSim (and I imagine, YASim, and others), our turbine model (for
example) features various temperatures that can be reported on a panel
display. For any unique aircraft, as well, there will be some
arbitrary number of engines, with controls associated with each
engine. In JSBSim, at least,
