David Megginson wrote:
Julian Foad writes:
No - we have that in some places, but I was thinking recently that it's
not the right way to go. I think the only practical purpose is to
reduce clutter in the browser; but the property browser could and should
do this for us if we
A while ago, Curt suggested moving from
/controls/afterburner[0]
/controls/afterburner[1]
/controls/afterburner[2]
/controls/afterburner[3]
/controls/mixture[0]
/controls/mixture[1]
/controls/mixture[2]
/controls/mixture[3]
/controls/propeller-pitch[0]
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:03:54 -0500
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago, Curt suggested moving from
/controls/afterburner[0]
This looks like a good idea, but one thing I'll throw out
here and maybe Tony has any idea on how we can handle
this. I am still planning in
David Megginson wrote:
A while ago, Curt suggested moving from
...
and so on, to something more sane:
/controls/engine[0]/
/controls/engine[1]/
/controls/engine[2]/
/controls/engine[3]/
Yes, lovely. Excellent.
We could even go to
/controls/engines/engine[0/
and so on to
Julian Foad writes:
No - we have that in some places, but I was thinking recently that it's
not the right way to go. I think the only practical purpose is to
reduce clutter in the browser; but the property browser could and should
do this for us if we want it to.
It also makes life
