Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/T38
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv23354
Modified Files:
T38.xml
I'd vote for a modification of the 3D model. The cones behind the
engines don't look _that_ realistic when sitting idle on the runway:
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/T38
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv23354
Modified Files:
T38.xml
I'd vote for a modification of the 3D model. The cones behind the
engines don't look _that_ realistic when sitting idle on
Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/T38
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv23354
Modified Files:
T38.xml
I'd vote for a modification of the 3D model. The cones behind the
engines don't
Martin Spott wrote:
and _if_ they appear the probably should be sort of yellow/orange,
not white,
Not really, the T-38 doesn't have an afterburner.
It's meant to be the heath buildup that disturbs the airflow and hence
influences the visibility in the specific area.
Erik
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's meant to be the heath buildup that disturbs the airflow and hence
influences the visibility in the specific area.
Personally I consider the cones a bit dominant for this purpose,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
On 16 Sep 2003 08:39:26 GMT,
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/T38
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv23354
Modified Files:
T38.xml
I'd vote for a modification
