Melchior FRANZ writes
It is beyond me why nobody seems to understand the purpose of the UFO.
It was never meant to be a serious aircraft. It is the scenery
exploration tool. It doesn't need to have a cockpit or a "realistic"
FDM. It uses up 76 kB uncompressed, and 10.8 kB compressed! Even
t
Oh, and before the first points me to --fdm=ufo: I know that, of course.
--fdm=ufo and --fdm=magic can be used with any aircraft. This is actually
very useful for getting acquainted with how nav/ils instruments work.
But this is only settable from the command line, but not from fgrun,
where you *ne
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
It's not the UFO that's superfluous, but the discussion about its
removal. I wouldn't even list it as an aircraft that's up for
discussion. Sheesh.
Good point. I would drop it from the aircraft list, but not from
distribution. It's no real aircraft and doesn't use real
* George Patterson -- Thursday 10 November 2005 11:06:
> Drop the ufo as fun as it is for testing purposes it has no cockpit,
> and can't be verified as to the realism of the flight model.
It is beyond me why nobody seems to understand the purpose of the UFO.
It was never meant to be a serious air
