Bernie Bright wrote:
Personally I'd prefer BK instead of yet another cvs clone but then again do we
really need to change revision control systems at all?
We don't need to.
But since some CVS administrators seem to be struggling to achive some
things they want ...
Erik
_
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 10:38:41 +0100
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Today I read about subversion on the OpenBSD magizine site.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/
> "Subversion is meant to be a better CVS, so it will have most of CVS's
> features, with as many as possible i
Hi,
Today I read about subversion on the OpenBSD magizine site.
http://subversion.tigris.org/
"Subversion is meant to be a better CVS, so it will have most of CVS's
features, with as many as possible in the 1.0 release. The main
exception is "svn blame" (i.e., "cvs annotate"), which has been
