Cameron Moore writes:
David, I'm curious about an article (and a patch) you wrote in March last
year:
http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt/lists/fgfs/archive-200103/msg00206.html
It should be possible to configure appropriate gear for all of the
UIUC models now.
As I understand
fgfs --fdm=larcsim --aero=uiuc \
^
This one is new to me as it was not necessary in 0.7.8. The rest was already
known to me - I read about the aircraft/aero change and the directory path
has been there as long as I know FlightGear.
Thanks alot,
Martin.
--
Unix
David Megginson wrote:
That, in fact, is the root of the problem -- UIUC uses an absolute
directory rather than one relative to $FG_ROOT, so we cannot easily
make *-set.xml files. If we changed that, it could be as easy as
fgfs --aircraft=f104-uiuc
That's a one liner:
---
Yes. JSBSim is now the default flight model.
Jon
- Original Message -
From: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: re: [Flightgear-devel] UIUC; Was: Release schedule for 0.7.9
fgfs --fdm=larcsim --aero=uiuc
Martin Spott writes:
This one is new to me as it was not necessary in 0.7.8.
That's because we switched the default FDM from LaRCSim to JSBSim.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Erik Hofman writes:
That's a one liner:
--- /home/erik/src/CVS/fgfs/FlightGear/src/Main/options.cxx Tue Feb
5 18:08:29 2002
+++ options.cxx Fri Feb 8 11:07:09 2002
@@ -674,7 +674,8 @@
} else if ( arg.find( --aero= ) == 0 ) {
fgSetString(/sim/aero,
I believe this was meant for the list...
--
Cameron Moore
[ I spilled spot remover on my dog. He's gone now. ]
- Forwarded message from Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: re: [Flightgear-devel] UIUC; Was: Release
Martin Spott writes:
Sorry to disturb you again. I've been looking through list archives and
trying on my own already for hours but I still don't get 'fgfs' running with
any UIUC model. If someone could tell me how it _should_ work in 0.7.9 then
I'd be glad to try it and report further
