Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
For FlightGear and X-Plane. There may be problems working with Microsoft's
Flight Simulator as it uses a different airport database than us.
X-Plane is meanwhile supported by a customized version of "squawkbox" -
implemented via some kind of plugin ... So: X-Plane curre
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:28:20 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On September 25, 2004 04:55 pm, Oliver C. wrote:
> > And this would be to create our own full open source ATC network
> > that is capable to speak to FlightGear and X-Plane and Microsoft's
> > Flight Simulator.
>
For FlightGear and X-Plane. There may be problems working with Microsoft's
Flight Simulator as it uses a different airport database than us.
Ampere
On September 25, 2004 04:55 pm, Oliver C. wrote:
> And this would be to create our own full open source ATC network
> that is capable to speak to F
On Saturday 25 September 2004 20:38, Boris Koenig wrote:
>
> The major disadvantage would of course be that there's no
> integration with existing virtual ATC networks - so,
> there wouldn't be any existing ATC community to really
> 'drive' such a FlightGear ATC project ... and even if you
> could
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..what do we have right now? FG can be rigged to run as
an "ATC World Server" now, right?
lol, I don't even know about that :-)
another evidence for the lack of documentation about FG :-/
We have xatc as a viable client to that "FG ATC World Server",
I haven't yet really play
