Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread David Megginson
Erik Hofman wrote: The WeatherCM module isn't actively maintained anymore. Try building with --without-weathercm I talked with Curt about removing WeatherCM over a year ago, but I didn't want to go through with it in case the module sprang back to life. In the event, it clearly causes a lot

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Erik Hofman
David Megginson wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: The WeatherCM module isn't actively maintained anymore. Try building with --without-weathercm I talked with Curt about removing WeatherCM over a year ago, but I didn't want to go through with it in case the module sprang back to life. In the event, it

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
David Megginson wrote: I talked with Curt about removing WeatherCM over a year ago, but I didn't want to go through with it in case the module sprang back to life. In the event, it clearly causes a lot of confusion for users and still isn't functional, as far as I can tell. As part of the

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Orthonormalize
developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:02 AM Subject: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx) Erik Hofman wrote: The WeatherCM module isn't actively maintained anymore. Try building with --without-weathercm I talked with Curt about removing

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Orthonormalize wrote: here are my observations: 1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there are way too many configurations for flightgear. the problem seems in trying to support every platform out of the box, fightgear supports no platform. i know that sounds

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Jim Wilson
Orthonormalize said: now, that said, i've spent over a WEEK trying to build flightgear. only today (i pray) will i finish the task. here are my observations: 1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there are way too many configurations for flightgear. the

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Orthonormalize wrote: FlightGear Codebase Weight Reduction Program, i like it already. first of all, let me preface this by saying i LOVE flightgear. i think it's the best thing since sliced bread. also here's a little background: i'm a recently laid off software engineer (yes i too had me job

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Orthonormalize
- From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:20 AM Subject: Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx) Orthonormalize wrote: here are my observations: 1) the autoconf/configure process

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Orthonormalize wrote: i'm only saying lynux, windows and mac because those developers (like me) are probably less advanced than someone using say IRIX. if you're using an IRIX box then right there i know your smarter than me. just this morning i'm having trouble building Simgear. i'm using cygwin

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Frederic BOUVIER
Jim Wilson wrote: Orthonormalize said: now, that said, i've spent over a WEEK trying to build flightgear. only today (i pray) will i finish the task. here are my observations: 1) the autoconf/configure process is extremely fickle. in my opinion there are way too many

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Orthonormalize
when X11 is installed on Cygwin: how do i uninstall X11 using cygwin? thanks, john - Original Message - From: Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:13 AM Subject: Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re

RE: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Richard Bytheway
honestly have you ever tried building this thing from scratch? again i'm not trying to be harsh but the build process is really quite complicated and i haven't succeeded yet. You reported earlier problems with plib/ul.h, what did you do to get past that and other earlier problems. If

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Frederic BOUVIER
Orthonormalize wrote: thanks fred! Generally, people use g++ under Cygwin, or use the MS Visual Studio with MS compiler. i think i might be the first using cygwin/windows/.Net-Vc7 given my troubles. anyway i've tried both g++ and Vc7 and have problems either way. I have success

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Orthonormalize
- From: Frederic BOUVIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:29 PM Subject: Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx) Orthonormalize wrote: thanks fred! Generally, people use g++ under Cygwin, or use

Re: Removing WeatherCM (was Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs.cxx)

2004-03-16 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Orthonormalize wrote: Are you sure you installed g++ ? oh yeah, i installed and reinstalled cygwin several times. If you want to drop cygwin and use Visual Studio, I can help you with project files. can you send your .sln and .vcproj files? (me email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I just