Wondered why the sudden increase in network traffic when starting
FlightGear just now. Then heard the new intro theme. Cute! Very cute!
Bernie
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heh, it doesn't sound too cool if you've got a 56k modem!
On Sunday 19 May 2002 8:59 am, you wrote:
Wondered why the sudden increase in network traffic when starting
FlightGear just now. Then heard the new intro theme. Cute! Very cute!
Bernie
Hello,
I haven't found 0.7.10 source code on the download section. Where could i
find it?
Julius Seporaitis
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
* Bernie Bright -- Sunday 19 May 2002 06:23:
As for line endings I think its simpler if we just use CRLF for both
client and server. I will check that the new server always sends CRLF.
ACK
Not that this is in any way obligatory, but the perl documentation says:
$ man perlipc|col -b|grep
Julius writes:
Hello,
I haven't found 0.7.10 source code on the download section. Where could i
find it?
It's in /pub/fgfs/Source on the ftp server (or the mirrors)
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just updated my Simgear, Flightgear, fgfsbase trees from CVS and
compiled them. But when I try to run fgfs it exits with next error:
Processing command line arguments
Finished command line arguments
Opening a window: 1024x768
game mode params = width=1024 height=768 bpp=16
Xlib:
Flavio Villanustre writes:
I've just updated my Simgear, Flightgear, fgfsbase trees from CVS and
compiled them. But when I try to run fgfs it exits with next error:
Processing command line arguments
Finished command line arguments
Opening a window: 1024x768
game mode params =
Xlib: extension GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest missing on display :0.0.
GLUT: Fatal Error in fgfs: visual with necessary capabilities not found.
Hah! Try running something that uses full texturing such as gloss;
the differences in private requests between GL implementations generally
appear
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Alex Perry wrote:
Xlib: extension GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest missing on display :0.0.
GLUT: Fatal Error in fgfs: visual with necessary capabilities not found.
Hah! Try running something that uses full texturing such as gloss;
the differences in private requests
Flavio Villanustre writes:
I've just updated my Simgear, Flightgear, fgfsbase trees from CVS and
compiled them. But when I try to run fgfs it exits with next error:
Processing command line arguments
Finished command line arguments
Opening a window: 1024x768
game mode params = width=1024
OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
Curt, David: I humbly request that such patches not be accepted in the
future.
I really think that grabbing files off the network without explicit
permission from the user is a bad idea, even when it's all in good fun.
FlightGear is not, by nature, a
Very interesting link!
I have to say I did nmot like the www.cs.unc.edu clouds very much, the
screenshots looked good, but the demo showed the problems.
Off course it may be the same for this paper, often clouds look better
in single screenshots than in a moving simulator, looking at them from
Tony comments:
OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
For you maybe ... 8-)
I really think that grabbing files off the network without explicit
permission from the user is a bad idea, even when it's all in good fun.
1. Putting the magic download into the base package CVS would have
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Norman Vine wrote:
Try running FGFS with no commandline parameters
or simply --geometry=1024x768
Your problem may be related to requesting gamemode
and/or bpp=16
Norman, tried both with no success. Now I'm looking at a libGL.a that
XFree86-devel rpm from RedHat 7.3
Tony Peden wrote:
OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
Curt, David: I humbly request that such patches not be accepted in the
future.
I really think that grabbing files off the network without explicit
permission from the user is a bad idea, even when it's all in good fun.
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
website, sometimes for logging and sometimes anonymous as in this case.
It is
Martin Henne wrote:
Tony Peden wrote:
OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
Curt, David: I humbly request that such patches not be accepted in the
future.
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Flavio Villanustre wrote:
Norman, tried both with no success. Now I'm looking at a libGL.a that
XFree86-devel rpm from RedHat 7.3 has dropped into /usr/X11R6/lib.
As soon as I have a clue I'll let you know to warn other people migrating
to RedHat 7.3.
I've finally
On Sun, 2002-05-19 at 17:39, Alex Perry wrote:
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
website, sometimes for
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bernie Bright -- Sunday 19 May 2002 06:23:
As for line endings I think its simpler if we just use CRLF for both
client and server. I will check that the new server always sends CRLF.
ACK
Not that this is in any way
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
website, sometimes for logging and sometimes anonymous as in this
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 07:05:37PM -0700, Alex Perry wrote:
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
Well I knew it was there and forgot about it. I always run from a text window
so a quick CTRL+C closed the player and saved my bandwidth. Seems to me that
Curt meant it as a joke, no harm intended, albeit a little less gratifying for
modem users. It's only for one day. So my suggestion is
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:38:40AM -, Jim Wilson wrote:
Well I knew it was there and forgot about it. I always run from a text window
so a quick CTRL+C closed the player and saved my bandwidth. Seems to me that
Curt meant it as a joke, no harm intended, albeit a little less gratifying
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Peden) [2002.05.19 15:36]:
OK, ha, ha, funny, funny. Joke's over.
Man, I've been trying to figure out what the heck you guys are talking
about. Anybody else that doesn't have mpg123 installed? :-)
Anyway, it's not even funny. I thought it was going to be a Stars
I get a Fatal error when trying to use some aircraft because I don't
have the 3D model installed. For example, I don't have the Harrier or
the Beech99 models installed. I'd suggest that we not cause a fatal
error on models that are not shipped in the base package? Or possibly,
just don't cause
How about we have a missing model in the same way as we have a
missing texture ? A ten meter cube with that texture on each side ?
I get a Fatal error when trying to use some aircraft because I don't
have the 3D model installed. For example, I don't have the Harrier or
the Beech99 models
Alex Perry writes:
How about we have a missing model in the same way as we have a
missing texture ? A ten meter cube with that texture on each side ?
I remember a blue and yellow glider
Norman
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Perry writes:
How about we have a missing model in the same way as we have a
missing texture ? A ten meter cube with that texture on each side ?
I remember a blue and yellow glider
I thought that was the default model, i.e. the one that is used if you
don't specify otherwise.
Alex Perry writes:
Alex Perry writes:
How about we have a missing model in the same way as we have a
missing texture ? A ten meter cube with that texture on
each side ?
I remember a blue and yellow glider
I thought that was the default model, i.e. the one that is used if you
don't
Alex Perry wrote:
I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule,
that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of
others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home
website, sometimes for logging and sometimes
Hi all
Is there any flight gear source code for visual c++ 6.0
if there exist please send me its address
thanks alotDo You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
32 matches
Mail list logo
