.Gene Buckle wrote:
Avionics power ratings are always available as nominal and max normal
draw. Electrical systems are designed with a bit of extra capacity to
deal with power on rush current, etc.
The only time an aircraft author would have to give the the current draw
any thought at all is if
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Paul Surgeon writes:
I'm sure this subject has been brought up plenty of times but I
think it would be great to compile a list of all the features that
we need the FG terrain rendering system to support.
Norman Vine writes:
- Ability to cut in polygon models
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Lee Elliott wrote:
Hello list,
Basically more for info and speculation than anything else.
I've just received an e-mail from a 'John Ridouts' that consists of
nothing but an attachment titled '~WRD0564.scr'
It's a virus - new mimail variant.
The reason I mention it
.Gene Buckle wrote:
Avionics power ratings are always available as nominal and max normal
draw. Electrical systems are designed with a bit of extra capacity to
deal with power on rush current, etc.
The only time an aircraft author would have to give the the current draw
any thought
Gene Buckle wrote:
.Gene Buckle wrote:
Avionics power ratings are always available as nominal and max normal
draw. Electrical systems are designed with a bit of extra capacity to
deal with power on rush current, etc.
The only time an aircraft author would have to give the the current draw
any
make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Documents and
Settings/jbarrett/Desktop/FlightSim/Devel/cvsroot/source/utils/js_server'
g++ -g -O2 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o js_server.exe
js_server.o -lplibjs -lplibnet -lplibul
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1/../../../libplibjs.a(jsWindows.o)(.tex
- Original Message -
From: John Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] cygwin js-server build error
make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/c/Documents and
- Original Message -
From: John Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] cygwin js-server build error
- Original Message -
From: John Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Barrett wrote:
180: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [js_server.exe] Error 1
is there another lib that needs to be linked on cygwin to get this to
compile ??
Forget that question -- needed $(audio_LIBS) added to js_server_LDADD in
- Original Message -
From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] cygwin js-server build error
John Barrett wrote:
180: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
After looking through the various instrumentation files, I noticed that
there is no weight data associated with the instruments.
For those that don't know, each instrument that goes into the panel is
labeled with its weight. This is done to make sure that an accurate dry
weight can be
I'm amazed at how many times I've searched for info on wgs84 and projections
and datums on Google and get FlightGear mailing lists appearing on the first
page.
It's good to see that FlightGear/TerraGear are so highly regarded in the GIS
world. ;)
Paul
I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG...
it uses a short compiled program to generate a header file used by the rest
of the package... I've added the program to Makefile.am, and it builds, now,
how do I get that program to execute before the library that depends
John Barrett writes:
I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into FG...
it uses a short compiled program to generate a header file used by the rest
of the package... I've added the program to Makefile.am, and it builds, now,
how do I get that program to execute before
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:20:42 -0800 (PST)
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any interest in getting that detailed on the WB calcs? When
duplicating a real-world instrument, the weights are easily available
and a generic weight could be assigned to avionics that don't model a
specific
Gene Buckle writes:
After looking through the various instrumentation files, I noticed that
there is no weight data associated with the instruments.
For those that don't know, each instrument that goes into the panel is
labeled with its weight. This is done to make sure that an
Is there any interest in getting that detailed on the WB calcs? When
duplicating a real-world instrument, the weights are easily available
and a generic weight could be assigned to avionics that don't model a
specific real world model/brand.
The only problem with that I think is that it
On Friday 14 November 2003 11:11, Jon Stockill wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Lee Elliott wrote:
Hello list,
Basically more for info and speculation than anything else.
I've just received an e-mail from a 'John Ridouts' that consists of
nothing but an attachment titled '~WRD0564.scr'
Also, on some small twin's you can't run everything on only one bus. So if
you have a problem with one of the buses or the alternator you will have to
shut down some extra stuff or risk draining your battery.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today I had a chance to see a driving sim located at KMSP. They use
it to train drivers for driving around on the airport grounds
(taxiways, runways, service roads, tunnels, etc.) The really
interesting thing about this sim is they had a beautifully done model
of the airport. Every light, every
On Friday 14 November 2003 15:42, Erik Hofman wrote:
Gene Buckle wrote:
.Gene Buckle wrote:
Avionics power ratings are always available as nominal and max normal
draw. Electrical systems are designed with a bit of extra capacity
to
deal with power on rush current, etc.
The only time
On Friday 14 November 2003 19:20, Gene Buckle wrote:
After looking through the various instrumentation files, I noticed that
there is no weight data associated with the instruments.
For those that don't know, each instrument that goes into the panel is
labeled with its weight. This is done
On Friday 14 November 2003 23:50, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Today I had a chance to see a driving sim located at KMSP. They use
it to train drivers for driving around on the airport grounds
(taxiways, runways, service roads, tunnels, etc.) The really
interesting thing about this sim is they had
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Today I had a chance to see a driving sim located at KMSP. They use
it to train drivers for driving around on the airport grounds
(taxiways, runways, service roads, tunnels, etc.) The really
interesting thing about this sim is they had a beautifully done model
David Megginson writes:
If they ever need a volunteer to taxi around a virtual plane, getting
in the drivers' way, let me know.
They actually had a pretty neat scripting system. You could click a
starting point, ending point, and a midpoint. The system would figure
a reasonably optimal route
- Original Message -
From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] automake question
John Barrett writes:
I've got some code from another project that I'm trying
John Barrett wrote:
I've got some code from another project that I'm trying to hook into
FG...
[which turns out to be:]
I'm integrating the SpiderMonkey JS engine
Into the client? Yikes. There was a big flame war the last time this
was mentioned. That interpreter is almost bigger than
I've generalized the AITanker into AIAircraft and freed it from KEMT, so now I
can put any airplane(s) anywhere (as well as boats and waterskiers). Here's
a picture of the KC-135 over San Francisco.
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/KC-135_over_SFO.jpg
Now I'd like to sail a ship through
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Surgeon) [2003.11.14 13:20]:
I'm amazed at how many times I've searched for info on wgs84 and projections
and datums on Google and get FlightGear mailing lists appearing on the first
page.
It's good to see that FlightGear/TerraGear are so highly regarded in the
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The e-mail addresses could be harvested from a number of places but it's
curious that the data that was obtained was so old and didn't include my
current ID.
One theory might be that it is someone who was subscribed to the list at some
point, then
Stupid idea: Has anyone thought to make a simple FDM for ground
vechicles? I admit it might get boring quickly, but in a multiplay
situation, it might be intresting to allow someone to simply watch
takeoffs from the ground, with a mobile camera. It's half-assed, and
since I can barely get FG
31 matches
Mail list logo
