[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] JSBSim's FGPropulsion.cpp doesn't compile on MSVC
Hi, the recent update to JSBSim doesn't compile with MSVC. The patch needed, one liner, is attached. Thanks, -Fred propulsion.diff Description: Binary data ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Linux User Developer Expo 2004]
On 1/14/04 at 1:22 PM Curtis L. Olson wrote: Ok, so far here is what I have: - Al West can definitely be there. - David Luff can definitely be there. - Jon Stockhill probably will be at the show and probably can help with the booth. - Matthew Law thinks he can be there but needs to clear it with his boss first. - Jim Brennan might also be able to make it. If your name is on this list and it shouldn't be, or I have the level of definiteness wrong, please let me know. But I think with 2 definites, 1 probably, and a need to get permission first, plus another maybe, we probably have enough to go ahead and reserve a booth. Sound reasonable? Sounds very reasonable - I suggest you go ahead and reserve it. Cheers - Dave ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux User Developer Expo 2004
On 1/14/04 at 11:34 AM Alex Perry wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote: a possible speaker slot at the Linux User Developer Expo 2004. If any of the booth people are willing to stand in front of a lot of people, I really recommend trying for a slot. I'm happy to talk if we do get a slot. Cheers - Dave ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux User Developer Expo 2004
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:04:32 + David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm happy to talk if we do get a slot. Cheers - Dave Would it be advantageous -- not only now, but for the future -- for major subsystem leads to write up a short monologue? For instance, if there was a concise writeup for each FDM, for visuals, for weather, etc., that might make for a better presentation and would be easier on the presenter, no? Jon ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Linux User Developer Expo 2004]
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 19:22, Curtis L. Olson wrote: See below David Luff wrote: OK, that's a definate now :-) Ok, so far here is what I have: - Al West can definitely be there. - David Luff can definitely be there. - Jon Stockhill probably will be at the show and probably can help with the booth. - Matthew Law thinks he can be there but needs to clear it with his boss first. - Jim Brennan might also be able to make it. I will attend if in the country (I live in Bristol). I will be interesting to meet you guys. Chris ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux User Developer Expo 2004
Alex wrote: I have no idea whether I can make it. It would be great if we could meet up again. I think I will be at the european flightsim show again, but do not know yet when it will be. AFAIK, it is the biggest flight sim trade show in the world. Last year, it was in Birmingham on the 5th of October :-). Bye bye, Wolfram. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Linux User Developer Expo 2004]
On Wednesday 14 Jan 2004 7:22 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: snip Any additional volunteers are also welcome. The more the merrier and the core staff always appreciates a bathroom break, or a chance to go look around the show themselves. If it gets too crowded in the booth, you can just stand outside and pretend to look interested and ask questions. Then everyone else will come over to see what's so interesting about our booth that it has a continual crowd. Also note that this is a 2-day event so it's not quite as big a commitment as LWCE which can push four days. I'm up for helping any way I can - transport kit?... lend my FG setup?... I've done a stand at the Farnborough Air Show once, but I know less about FG development than I think I need to in order to answer questions on the booth. Let me know what you want. In any event, as Martin said, it would be good to meet some people. Thanks! Curt. Regards Jonathan Richards (nearer to EG03 than EGLL, but that's not a problem!) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Blender news ...
FYI: Since yesterday Blender does integrate external Python scripts
into its menu. You just have to point a path at your script dir.
There's a new version of the ac3d{im,ex}porter that makes use of
this new infrastructure and has a few other improvements. The
importer does now appear in Blender's Import menu as AC3D ...,
it does no longer show the model rotated by 90 degree. The exporter
is in the Export menu and displays a sub-menu where you can
choose if you want to export the whole model, or just the selected
object. CVS from today (2.31a++) seems to be useable, for those
who want to try it. It's a vast improvement, IMO!
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: One time post to flightgear-devel]
Erik Hofman wrote: William Earnest wrote: - F-16 Model: Back in november there was some discussion about an F-16 Model for high angle of attack simulation. While browsing the NASA Langley tech report server today, I stumbled across 2 interesting documents: 1.) the much cited 1979 F16 report TP-1538 (used by Stevens/Lewis) is available on the web (= 31 MB !!). The report includes the full data table, and analysis of simulator flight and control laws for pitch, roll and yaw axis. However, be warned that these control laws might not really be related to the real control laws used on the production aircraft. One of the interesting things of the F-16 is that it rolls around it's velocity vector rather than the body axis to prevent high AOA to go into a large sideslip. This should be a challenge to model ... I just did a test. It already does that! It seems like at least a portion of the FCS is incorporated into the flight data! Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: UK Linux Expo 2004
Hi Curt, I can be there for one of the days, possibly two if the accomodation isn't too expensive. I can also bring my PC (17 TFT; Gentoo; Athlon 2500XP; FGFS CVS and GeForce Ti4200-128 with pedals and joystick), but I'd need help getting it and me there - I don't want to risk public transport. Alternatively, if anyone is attending who lives reasonably near to Sheffield and wishes to car share I'd be happy to take a car and drive down with them to cut costs. All the best, Matthew. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blender news ...
On Thursday, 15 January 2004 22:42, Melchior FRANZ wrote: The exporter is in the Export menu and displays a sub-menu where you can choose if you want to export the whole model, or just the selected object. Now that's useful! I use a lot of jigs when modeling aircraft and it's a pain having to remove all of them everytime I want to export and check it out in FlightGear. Paul ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: UK Linux Expo 2004
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Matthew Law wrote: Alternatively, if anyone is attending who lives reasonably near to Sheffield and wishes to car share I'd be happy to take a car and drive down with them to cut costs. I'll be travelling from Wakefield on the train. Hoping to be down there for both days. -- Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: Sky flashing roundup
Erik Hofman writes: Simon Hollier wrote: It's strange everyone is seeing a flash to black. I'm seeing a flash to white. I was able to reproduce it consistently by flying straight out of KSFO at noon with no heading change. It would flash once at ~1230 feet, again at ~1330 feet, and maybe once or twice more right around that altitude. I was logging all sky,fog,etc.. colors, sun angle, etc.. on the flightgear side and during the flash there were no noticable variances. I then went to the simgear side commented out dome-repaint and was not able to reproduce the error. Interesting default sky colors though : . I then uncommented dome-repaint and uncommented most of the printfs in dome.cxx(which causes 30M log files for a short flight) and wasn't able to reproduce the flashes at all( ~2 hours of flying ) before bed. Strange. Will look into it further with gdb tonight. Yep I see it also, except 10 times higher (12300 and 13300 feet). Could you try setting the altitude of the unused (clear) cloud layers to -1000 and check again? Erik Copied over to devel. Ok, I *think* the problem is that acos(i) and -acos(i) are returning 'nan' when i=1 in Time/sunpos.cxx line ~345. I'm not sure why or if that's exactly it, but I think it's close. I'll keep working on it after I fly for while : . -Simon. Simon Hollier Computer Services Northeast Health District ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
