Re: [Flightgear-devel] Arrays of doubles

2004-04-14 Thread Gerhard Wesp
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:03:49AM -0500, Jon Berndt wrote: class. All I want right now is how do I allocate storage for a 2 dimensional array of doubles, so that I can use the standard accessor operators: myDouble = Data[n][m]; If you insist on the [][] syntax, I'd strongly recommend a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation

2004-04-14 Thread Martin Spott
Norman Vine wrote: FWIW I would be much more excited about this if we were switching to a library designed for highend simulations such as OpenProducer which by the way also has a portable threading library OpenThreads this aims at OpenSceneGraph - doesn't it ? ;-) Martin. -- Unix

RE: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation

2004-04-14 Thread Norman Vine
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Spott Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation Norman Vine wrote: FWIW I would be much more excited

RE: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation

2004-04-14 Thread Norman Vine
Martin Spott writes: Norman Vine wrote: FWIW I would be much more excited about this if we were switching to a library designed for highend simulations such as OpenProducer which by the way also has a portable threading library OpenThreads this aims at OpenSceneGraph - doesn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation

2004-04-14 Thread Martin Spott
Norman Vine wrote: OpenProducer was written to support OpenSceneGraph but, it doesn't need OpenSceneGraph and more importantly it was designed to be used in 'multi-pipe' OpenGL systems as well as more conventional OpenGL configurations from the ground up. STLport, OpenThreads,

[Flightgear-devel] 3d panel visible externally. Why?

2004-04-14 Thread marco . gugel
I have a problem with the 3d panel. It is visible in the external views through the objects of the 3d model. Is there anyone who can help me? Thanks a lot Marco ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Flightgear-devel] 3d panel visible externally. Why?

2004-04-14 Thread Vivian Meazza
Marco asked Sent: 14 April 2004 15:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Flightgear-devel] 3d panel visible externally. Why? I have a problem with the 3d panel. It is visible in the external views through the objects of the 3d model. Is there anyone who can help me? Thanks a lot

[Flightgear-devel] Fixing the --waypoint and --flight-plan comman line options

2004-04-14 Thread Durk Talsma
Hey Folks, After my recent crash tests last weekend, I feel a need to be able to do this in a more controlled way. Therefore, I'd like to fix the --wp and --flight-plan options. It appears that these are broken, because the airport and route manager subsystems are not yet initialized when

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3d panel visible externally. Why?

2004-04-14 Thread Jim Wilson
marco.gugel said: I have a problem with the 3d panel. It is visible in the external views through the objects of the 3d model. Is there anyone who can help me? Thanks a lot Marco Some models need to have a range selector added for that. You probalby won't see that if you run a 16bit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SDL early access implementation

2004-04-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:11:08 -0400, Norman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One thing I would like todo is use DirectX ..this too is Microsoft's IP, no? rather then the normal WIN32 API for the event loop but what is there works well enough and was a lot less work when porting from the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing the --waypoint and --flight-plan comman line options

2004-04-14 Thread Durk Talsma
Well, since nobody objected... :-) I have a patch for this that appears to be working on my system. I want to do do a little more testing/cleaning up, so I can probably release it by tomorrow or so. Who would like to commit this to cvs? In which form? diffs or whole files? Cheers :-), Durk

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] FlightGear's 747-400 bugs?

2004-04-14 Thread Andy Ross
Durk Talsma wrote: I assumed that your latest yasim fuel code had a lot to do with this, which would explain why the cvs 747 is performing so much better (i.e. longer) Heh, that's because I cleverly introduced a units bug (kgs/lbs) in the process. :) It's fixed now, so the 747 should be a