Re: [Flightgear-devel] Realistic daytime skycolor

2005-11-23 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:25:31 +0100, Durk wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 22 November 2005 18:02, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: Like in the dawn screenshot where I tried to show that off;

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: picture of two USAF thuderbirds in mirror formation

2005-11-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:49:16 -0500, Ima wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Off topic, but something similar to this might make two interesting AI aircraft for around KSFO or KDCA or Nellis AFB, Nevada, USA where they're based. 8-) Best regards, Ima From netscape.com gallery:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Getting Started Guide - Terrain/Objects

2005-11-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:42:24 +0100, Oliver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I suggest to remove the SF bay scenery in the corresponding 10x10 scenery file. This allows us to place the SF bay, which comes allready with the base package, in the main scenery folder like all the other 10x10

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Announcement: First TerraGear landcover database

2005-11-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:11:00 -0600, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I should also point out that the next scenery build (which is happening concurrent to the v0.9.9 release and causing my head to spin 3x faster than normal (not factoring in beer)) will be based on this data

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pending v0.9.9 release

2005-11-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:32:22 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Erik Hofman wrote: Martin Spott wrote: RANTWe know exactly this phenomenon for several years now and to my [...] supporters for this idea./RANT Guess why the next release is 0.9.9 and not 1.0 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pending v0.9.9 release

2005-11-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:24:21 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yep, but sipmly _delaying_ the next release doesn't cure anything. This only makes sense if the developers agree on a feature freeze and announce a bugfix-only phase. ..or if it can be enforced

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Announcement: First TerraGear landcover database

2005-11-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:48:37 -0600, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..how much size growth, compared to the (0.9.7?) last scenery? (url to the new?) I haven't really started building a lot of tiles yet. I'm still hung up on a shapefile processing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] lightning

2005-11-08 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:49:56 +0100, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Josh Babcock wrote: Dave Culp wrote: All you experienced modelers, please tell me, is this possible? Can you set a piece of a model to flash somewhat randomly using only XML animation code? I'm pretty

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Aircraft Models

2005-11-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:43:20 -0200, Rodrigo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There�s lot of flightplans for lots of carriers designed by indepedent simmers on usual flight sim sites: www.avsim.com , www.fsfreeware.com , www.flightsim.com so, no need for PAI flight plans. About models

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Buildings ?????

2005-11-05 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:15:22 +1030, George wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 05:02 +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:03:10 -0800, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mike Kopack wrote: It's not so much an issue of San Fran being BAD

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Buildings ?????

2005-11-05 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 15:40:08 +0100, Arnt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:15:22 +1030, George wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 05:02 +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:03:10 -0800, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Compiling FG on Suse

2005-11-05 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 11:16:53 -0500, Steve wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:22:55 -0600, you wrote: Steve, you seem to have the following missing. - C++ compiler - X delopment libraries and header files are missing - OpenGL libraries and header file Have you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Buildings?????

2005-11-04 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:55:57 -0500, Josh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jim Wilson wrote: From: Mike Kopack snip Is there a way to get buildings to appear (like the wash monument, white house, pentagon, capital, etc.?) Did I load the scenery in wrong? Or is this just a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Threading for SMP, boon or bane?

2005-10-25 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:08:06 -0700, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Curtis L. Olson wrote: I would like to make a case for non-threading from the standpoint of simplicity. We have had (and probably still have) some extremely subtle and extremely difficult to track bugs in our

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Driving real instruments.

2005-10-25 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:59:31 +0100, Dave wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just wondering if anyone (pos historically) has driven physical instruments using FlightGear on Linux. I'm thinking the analog variety (ASI AI ALT etc) from the likes of SimKits. Obviously the SimKits stuff

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Winter Textures - screenshot

2005-10-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:11:19 +0200, Oliver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday 23 October 2005 22:16, Ralf Gerlich wrote: Hi, Arnt Karlsen schrieb: On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:27:56 +0200, Ralf wrote in message I'd say we need different texture-names for lakes which freeze

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Winter Textures - screenshot

2005-10-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:27:56 +0200, Ralf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Dave Culp schrieb: screenshot: http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/PC7-winter.jpg BTW, my lakes are still blue. Do we need an ice-water texture? The Lake of Constance - the greatest lake in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: A question regarding accurate taxiways

2005-10-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:50:00 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You won't be able to reverse-engineer the shape of such a junction because in real live they don't follow geometric perfection. ..maybe use some curve fitting library to generate those shapes at runtime?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was

2005-10-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:11:51 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I wonder if the flightgear server though should support the fsd protocol at some future point of time to be a gateway between our and VATSIM/IVAO flying... It's not a matter if it _should_ or not.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] DME range

2005-10-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:02:48 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: With VOR-DME it is definitely the slant range. I don't know about VORTACs, never flew a TACAN-equipped aircraft in the real life... ..sure? If you flew red star planes during the Cold War, you guys

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer ports

2005-10-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:30:44 +0100, Jim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi guys, Without wishing to start a flame war and perhaps starting another thread!! Anyone transmitting un-encrypted data across a world wide internet (as opposed to a private intranet) needs to think ahead a

[Flightgear-devel] ..we're not re-inventing pcproxy?, was README.multiplayer update

2005-10-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:36:22 +0200, Oliver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Freitag 14 Oktober 2005 19:28 schrieb Andy Ross: The NAT router will create a temporary IP/port combination for the client, and this combination is what the server will see when receiving data. The server

Re: [Flightgear-devel] A question regarding accurate taxiways

2005-10-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:54:47 +0200, Harald wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Martin Spott wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: To my opinion the X-Plane format isn't qualified for accurate runway and taxiway layout. This is Harald's opinion as well as mine ! _But_: Our opinion on this

[Flightgear-devel] ..picky preach to the choir, was: A revised README.Joystick.html

2005-10-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:58:51 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Friday 14 October 2005 10:23: At the company where I work as an IT guy if we update someone's work we add ourselves as the author so that people can see who are the authors and ask

Re: [Flightgear-devel] DME range

2005-10-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:04:09 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone know if the DME calculation to a VORTAC is based on slant range? Noticed when flying over a fix say at FL350, the range goes down to zero at station passage. It should be the AGLvalue of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] README.multiplayer update

2005-10-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:27:08 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: + +Options needed to enable multiplayer game with a server: Player1: ---multiplay=out,10,serveraddress,6000 --multiplay=in,10,myaddress,5500 ..this works ok with X in lan's? (X uses port 6000 too.) --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] README.multiplayer update

2005-10-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:36:43 +0200 (IST), Vassilii wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: + +Options needed to enable multiplayer game with a server: Player1: ---multiplay=out,10,serveraddress,6000 --multiplay=in,10,myaddress,5500 I'm confused. The CVS had my patch accepted, I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Microsoft artwork (!) in the 707 panel

2005-10-04 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:09:53 +0200, Georg wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hans-Georg Wunder schrieb: ... - Do we have a place to store aircrafts with uncompliant aircrafts ??? Hi Hans-Georg, there is an AVSIM category in the file library named FlightGear with 4

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Adding Reverse thrust to the b1900d

2005-10-04 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:43:52 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Martin Spott -- Monday 03 October 2005 16:36: Didn't some asian airline 'lose' a B767 after the reverser was activated on _one_ engine during flight ? It was *in* Asia, but an Austrian airline: Lauda Air.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] mp3 intro

2005-10-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:55:15 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ladislav Michnovič wrote: Hello. I want to ask if it is poissible to substitute intro mp3 with wav or ogg format. Because of legal problems distributing the mp3 playing software in USA with linux distro,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Adding Reverse thrust to the b1900d

2005-10-02 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:10:35 -0400, Ampere wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I want to bind it to the throttle instead, can I make the idle position to cut in at about 10% of the range of the stick with the reverser starting to kick in below that point. Bad idea. You don't want the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Microsoft artwork (!) in the 707 panel

2005-09-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:06:40 -0400, Jim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: Andy Ross Hans-Georg Wunder wrote: In the package there is a GPL-license. If this is enough, then everything is OK regarding the panel. Unfortunately, due to clear evidence of (minor, admittedly)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Crash carnage

2005-09-25 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:12:13 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..ahem, the big guys use opening shock damper rings to keep chute loads safe throughout the speed range, these rings use the chute opening loads to slow the chute opening. ;o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] new multiplayer patch

2005-09-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:21:27 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AJ MacLeod wrote: Certainly... Unfortunately it appears that the problem (for whatever reason) is still there... http://www.adeptopensource.co.uk/personal/fg/server_map_screenshot.png Hmm, this looks

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question: Online forums?

2005-09-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:21:59 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think a forum is a great idea. The biggest advantage I see over most mailing lists is that a forum is searchable. I see too many F/OSS projects with mailing lists that aren't searchable. Having a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Question: Online forums?

2005-09-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:53:14 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Alex Perry wrote: From: Curtis L. Olson - I'm getting really sick of spam. I think we do a pretty good job of protecting the list members themselves, but the list admins get continually pummeled with spam

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question: Online forums?

2005-09-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:21:59 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think a forum is a great idea. The biggest advantage I see over most mailing lists is that a forum is searchable. I see too many F/OSS projects with mailing lists that aren't searchable. Having a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] RE: Turbine Engine (Concorde, Hunter, and Citation Information Needed)

2005-09-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 20:33:09 +0200, Christian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AFAIK Porsche were the only ones that have build an extra electrical motor to turn the turbo after shut down. As car turbos get turned only ..turn the turbo??? You mean pump lube oil thru it till it's as cool

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Conference

2005-08-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 07:48:35 -0500, Jon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd give a lot to know what these two papers are presenting! See below: ..looks a lot like FUD to me, best handled by Groklaw or the Nazgul. ;o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Conference 26 - 29 Sep 2005 Hyatt Regency Crystal

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT: Mojave, CA

2005-08-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 16:10:54 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The Draken is a really impressive bird, especially considering the era in which it was designed. The US is pretty cocky about stuff invented over here, but the Draken had some really impressive specs for it's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] suggestions/questions regarding multiplayer

2005-08-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:59:21 +0100, David wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Harald JOHNSEN writes: Oliver Schroeder wrote: 2) chat messages [...] protocoll supports chat-messages and the ATC-module has functions to queue and display them on screen. So it should'nt be too hard

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NVIDIA 1.0-7667 breaks shadows entirely.

2005-08-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:13:54 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le lundi 01 août 2005 à 00:18 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:40:58 +0200, Oliver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 30 July 2005 16:25, Dave Martin wrote: I don't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NVIDIA 1.0-7667 breaks shadows entirely.

2005-08-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:08:03 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le lundi 01 août 2005 à 21:53 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : Being Nvidia and X installed , i continu to search a good answer : After many experimentations, I did not notice any change between 24bpp

Re: [Flightgear-devel] NVIDIA 1.0-7667 breaks shadows entirely.

2005-07-31 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:40:58 +0200, Oliver wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 30 July 2005 16:25, Dave Martin wrote: I don't know if anyone has brought this up yet but the 1.0-7667 driver from NVIDIA for linux breaks the drawn shadows as in they don't appear at all. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce Tricoloriaerobatic jet

2005-07-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:01:28 +0100, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 15:15, Vivian Meazza wrote: Dave Culp ... snip ... The present system makes smoke/contrails by releasing AI objects rapidly. There are three problems with it now: 1)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce Tricoloriaerobatic jet

2005-07-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:11:40 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..._sexy_ way to sneak in war game features: we need to model anti-aircraft lava ammo 'n turbine blade ash etc damage. ;o) We don't need it, only watch the TV, and wait for Iraki News. :=( ..bull, I see no

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce

2005-07-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:02:04 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..since we do have guns now in FG, and since Slobodan's shills didn't dare challenge my rulings ;o) on Geneva Convention disputes in soc.culture.yugoslavia, alt.war.yugoslavia etc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] jsbsim won't start with w110n40 or w110n30airports

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:47:26 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le mercredi 27 juillet 2005 à 23:15 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I did NOT ask for deleting that piece of code which

[Flightgear-devel] ..copyright infringement???, was: Free simulator of the Frecce Tricolori aerobatic jet

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:39:34 +0100, Dave wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Congratulation to the Author. The flight is wonderful, very accurate. Only little difficulties under Linux with the Upper-case, Lower-case mixing (direct.xml = Direct.xml, *.ase = *.ASE, instruments

[Flightgear-devel] ..on multiple licenses, also for MB339? , was: Cirrus SR20 Model?

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
PROTECTED]: ..and Sylpheed-1.9.6 was too alpha, so I'm back at 1.0.4-1. ;o) Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:38:39 -0500, Curtis wrote in message This could go two possible directions. If someone wants to volunteer to do this, it could be contributed to FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce Tricolori aerobatic jet

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:48:01 -0500, Dave wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since the MB-339 PAN is an on-going project, we plan to release an improved version of the aircraft (with smokes?). We have smoke/contrails now, but they need a lot of work:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce Tricolori aerobatic jet

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:20:38 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Andy Ross wrote: Basically, it seems to me like these guys are fine, with a few nit-picky exceptions like the joystick configuration. I don't think Yes, but why the joystick configuration and not the sound

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Free simulator of the Frecce Tricolori aerobatic jet

2005-07-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:34:13 -0700 (PDT), Craig wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all, Where do I find this aircraft. Is it released yet? ..chk down the $FGROOT/data/aircraft/ tree. Craig Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:48:01 -0500, Dave wrote

Re: [Flightgear-devel] jsbsim won't start with w110n40 or w110n30airports

2005-07-27 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I did NOT ask for deleting that piece of code which is rather good (and could be improved), i only ask for to remove the new AGL test ^^ which delete the UNDERCARIAGE

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Cirrus SR20 Model?

2005-07-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:38:39 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This could go two possible directions. If someone wants to volunteer to do this, it could be contributed to FlightGear for everyone to enjoy. The person requesting this might also be able to pay some smallish

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gui theming

2005-07-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:18:50 -0400, Jim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: Melchior FRANZ * Ampere K. Hardraade -- Tuesday 12 July 2005 19:15: On July 11, 2005 04:26 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote: http://members.aon.at/mfranz/fgfs_gui8.jpg [50 kB] That's so nice. I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Custom scenery integration

2005-07-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 21:51:24 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Norman Vine wrote: Ralf Gerlich writes: Actually, I _do_ agree that having preprocessed scenery _is_ an advantage. But it does have disadvantages as well: 1.) At the current state it appears (to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] About 3D Clouds

2005-07-02 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 09:00:52 +0200, Mathias wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That is it. Setting bits-per-pixel to 32 makes the models throw phantastic well looking shadows! At least for my box with the binary ati driver. ..AFAIK, ATI cards cannot do 32bpp. They use 24 bit hardware. They

[Flightgear-devel] ..multi-X trick ideas, was: FlightGear got killed (seems like memory problem)

2005-06-26 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:28:04 -0400, Ampere wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I uninstalled Xorg and went back to XFree today so I could do some testing with XFree and the latest FlightGear CVS. ..a tad drastic, for FG development, you could simply set up two runlevels, say

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New aircraft ideas ?

2005-06-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:26:40 -0700 (PDT), Alex wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Got an idea for a new aircraft (not airplane) you'd like to try ? http://www.dodsbir.net/Topics/Default.asp Topic: A05-208 ..concerns semiballistic 40-105 mm munitions with enhanced lethality capable of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Debugging Throttle control in Native-ctrls

2005-06-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:51:01 -0500, bass wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I'm sending joystick input through Simulink in Matlab to Flightgear using the Native-ctrls structure. I am able to control everything pretty satisfactorily, everything except the throttle... its gone

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New turbo/supercharger code

2005-06-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:08:05 -0700, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: Andy Ross wrote: Yeah, but that's a bug. There is only one manifold pressure. Surely you don't want *both* mp-inhg and supercharger-output-inhg, which mean exactly the same thing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE: msvc7.1 compiling problem

2005-06-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:14:06 +0200, Harald wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: eagle monart wrote: other problem is about strange rectangles in sim... I ve the same problem even in 0.9.8 release compile.. i can see these rectangles almost everywhere in clouds , on the sea and on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Off Topic: Father's Day Card/Gift

2005-06-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:03:19 -0400, Theo wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If anyone needs a Father's Day card, I made this one for my Dad (one of those guys who has everything). It's non-flightsim related, but kind of tech-ish and completely free for use:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Short Reference Document error?

2005-06-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:33:19 -0500, Jon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, you think the UK is part of Europe, eh? We use the same convention as the US for ./, Vivian. Heh. :-) What's above the number 4 (not on the numeric keypad)? Is it a $ or a ? (not sure that will print

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New turbo/supercharger code

2005-06-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:24:09 -0700, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Vivian Meazza wrote: OK with the name. PSI(gauge) is what we use over here, otherwise it's inhg absolute for the US. Gauge-inhg makes no sense. In real life there's no difference between the way the US and UK

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE: msvc7.1 compiling problem

2005-06-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 03:02:53 +, eagle wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: thank you guys , finaly compiled the latest source : )) but still i am looking for the puffy clouds that i saw in devel mailing list. How can I enable puffy clouds??? . I played with layers types

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:35:23 +0100, Vivian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mathias Frhlich wrote On Mittwoch 15 Juni 2005 11:00, Vivian Meazza wrote: When browsing Mark Harris' web page I got the impression that he simulates the airflow. This one?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SP_FMDS

2005-06-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:54:28 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed in the cockpit.cxx file the instance of ENABLE_SP_FMDS and a search uncovers a trail into the fg_init, config.h, as well as into the HUD.cxx files. There seems to infer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SP_FMDS

2005-06-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:09:18 +0200, Erik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..speaking of which; Are those Big-Overhaul-So-Lay-Off-cvs jobs done in the FG and JSBSim cvs trees? As far as I know, yes (?) ..ok, I've seen no further notices yet in the *-announce

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hurricane

2005-06-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:07:13 +0100, Jon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Erik Hofman wrote: Jon Stockill wrote: As he said - extensive studies of people who spent upwards of 8 hours at a time sitting in front of such instruments has shown that they're losing teeth and hair,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New turbo/supercharger code

2005-06-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:26:33 -0700, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The cleanest solution at this point, IMHO, would to split out the x-charger implementation and do it twice: once for gear-driven superchargers and again for exhaust-driven turbochargers. ..these can re-use code

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:50:18 +0200, Arnt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:39:21 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:40:23 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..duh, you bought the Sullivan generator for $79! ;o) http://www.sullivanproducts.com/GenesysContent.htm Yes, I'm hoping I can rig up an onboard power system based on the genesys

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/ If you scroll down a bit there's a take off picture (with the tail wheel just coming up) and then two landing pictures (notice the position of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:50:21 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le lundi 13 juin 2005 01:13 +0200, Gerard Robin a crit : Le dimanche 12 juin 2005 22:07 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a crit : On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:43:44 +0200, Paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:11:42 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It was said that we do not have to make the Hollywood quality movie and i agree. ..we have enough to get funding for the missing bits. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:39:21 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/ If you scroll down a bit there's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-12 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:43:44 +0200, Paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday, 12 June 2005 09:22, Erik Hofman wrote: Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: I like that idea. It would be nice to fly along the coast of a tropical island, look down and be able to see the white sand under

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property cloning solution

2005-06-10 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:38:55 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 13:21 -0500, Dave Culp a crit : //FDMctr++; Tested with my own carrier landing patched release : IT IS OK == no clone now, JSB specific Functions working after reset.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-10 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:36:35 -0400, Josh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dave Culp wrote: This is a poll. Does anyone really want the FDM to allow flying under the terrain, or was that a misunderstanding by me? If nobody wants it then I think it should be disallowed. Maybe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-10 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:53:23 +0200, Frederic wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dave Culp a crit : This is a poll. Does anyone really want the FDM to allow flying under the terrain, or was that a misunderstanding by me? If nobody wants it then I think it should be disallowed.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] property cloning solution

2005-06-10 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:16:06 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 22:59 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a crit : On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:38:55 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 13:21 -0500, Dave Culp a crit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-10 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:44:39 +0100, Vivian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ampere K. Hardraade wrote hmm... flying undersea. Isn't that what submarines do? Nope ... they just float a bit lower down than surface ships. Hydrofoils fly. ..let's qualify fly; both submarines and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Main Airports Conflict with Graphic Card6600GT !!!

2005-06-08 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:45:40 +0200, Gerard wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: IT IS UNUSUAL that i give the question and later on the answer :-) ..but very helpful for FlightGear and the next guys wonderng about the same thing, it also allows the Hell No!, you got it all wrong! because you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE: R22 alpha version

2005-06-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +1000, Mostyn wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 06 June 2005 09:16: I *HATE* competition! Please, make it go away! ... Fortunately, one could almost say that I have a *tiny* head start. So, don't panic ... panic? Whaahh ... Okay,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain height below aircraft

2005-06-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:19:02 -0700, Drew wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a reliable way to determine the terrain height below the aircraft that is independent of the view being used? I've tried the property /environment/ground-elevation-m, but when I use tower view, it returns

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Airports Data + Zoom + SHIPs

2005-06-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:55:33 +0100, AJ wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 07 Jun 2005 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) I am using FGFS Version 0.9.4, I noticed that the Airport Data file extensions changed to tgz, does the data can be used on the version 0.9.4. Have you

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Colditz Glider

2005-06-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:35:03 +0100, Steve wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 00:42, Josh Babcock wrote: OK, model's done, same address. Now I'm going to do the animation XML. If I'm really cool I'll be able to make the wind ribbon look good. Otherwise, just controls

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: R22 alpha version

2005-06-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:58:52 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 06 June 2005 09:16: I *HATE* competition! Please, make it go away! ... Fortunately, one could almost say that I have a *tiny* head start. So, don't panic ... panic? Whaahh ...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Building joystick hardware

2005-06-06 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 11:46:55 -0700, Andy wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Torsten Dreyer wrote: Well - it's not really a serial driver, the interface connects thru the handshake lines rts/cts and dtr with rxd and txd left unconnected since the LTC1090 speaks a synchronous protocol.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Help... aircraft texture

2005-06-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:54:48 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When asked for the Compression Type, choose Aggressive RLE (Not supported by SGI). (This *is* supported by SGI, it's in SGI's own SGI image format spec. This compression type is supported by GIMP, KDE,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re:[Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Models/Airport beacon.xml, 1.8,

2005-05-30 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 30 May 2005 08:50:43 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Jon Berndt -- Monday 30 May 2005 00:26: Melchior FRANZ wrote: When you fly over a beacon, the ground cache has to eat all these triangles, which makes the FDM stutter or even hang. Is the ground

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-flightmodel] Ground observer position

2005-05-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:38:24 +0200, Sam wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I am trying to create a new view for my RC UAV. The view I would like is a ground observer, standing by the edge of the runway, near the aircraft. This is the view section I have included in my aircraft-set

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot

2005-05-28 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 27 May 2005 15:26:58 -0500, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Vance Souders wrote: I want to implement an acrobatic AI autopilot and was debating a few different ways of tackling the problem. I was thinking of either creating a spline based system or tuning the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FDM freeze

2005-05-26 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 26 May 2005 11:37:13 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dave Culp wrote: Lately I've been flying around German terrain and have been getting an FDM freeze at seemingly random occasions after flying for ten minutes or so. Here's a screenshot of the freeze:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: FlightGear startup time

2005-05-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 24 May 2005 14:26:17 +0200, Melchior wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Norman Vine -- Tuesday 24 May 2005 14:05: I guess I should mention the deficiencies of non MSoft OSs but I will leave the *flames* for another time :-) Yeah, don't bother. 99% of Windows users don't know

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Strange acceleration issues with 9.8---possibly terrain related?

2005-05-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:43 -0500, Wesley wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I have Gentoo Linux 2.6.9 running on a 1 GHz Pentium III, with an ATI Radeon Mobility M6 card. ..and lspci calls it a what??? 1 or 2 years ago, I remember having FlightGear working properly. Now, I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] today's 3d clouds commit

2005-05-23 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 22 May 2005 23:23:49 +0100, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 21 May 2005 17:33, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sat, 21 May 2005 10:54:30 +0100, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The system that has the problem is fitted with an ATI 9200 256MB card and I've

Re: [Flightgear-devel] today's 3d clouds commit

2005-05-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 21 May 2005 10:54:30 +0100, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Monday 16 May 2005 23:47, Lee Elliott wrote: On Monday 16 May 2005 13:42, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Dave Culp wrote: MenuBar-View-Rendering-Enable 3d clouds I can't get the new 3d clouds to appear here

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >