[Flightgear-devel] 3DClouds versus 2DClouds
Everybody agree with 3DClouds, it is beautiful. I think so. But, is any way to make the result realistic regarding the weather (fictif or metar it is the same problem). You will find here an exemple which makes unusable 3DClouds if we want the good reality. http://ghours.club.fr/2Dclouds-versus-3Dclouds.jpg -- Gerard ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] 3DClouds versus 2DClouds
Gerard Robin wrote: Everybody agree with 3DClouds, it is beautiful. I think so. But, is any way to make the result realistic regarding the weather (fictif or metar it is the same problem). You will find here an exemple which makes unusable 3DClouds if we want the good reality. http://ghours.club.fr/2Dclouds-versus-3Dclouds.jpg You are right there is a bug here. The cloud layers don't update themselfs when the parameters are changed in the dialog. The change is applied only when reselecting the metar choice in the weather scenario dialog. I'll check that. Harald. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
