Melchior FRANZ wrote:
The validator doesn't think so:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flightgear.org%2Findex.shtml
The point I think you are trying to make is that the validator still
has squawks. The proposed fix *does* make IE6 happy and linux/firefox
still works.
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 22:52:
The point I think you are trying to make is that the validator still
has squawks.
No. The point was that the validator complains about the missing type,
which is apparently a *BUG*. So the most obvious thing to do would have
been to fix the bug
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 22:52:
The point I think you are trying to make is that the validator still
has squawks.
No. The point was that the validator complains about the missing type,
which is apparently a *BUG*. So the most obvious thing to do
Well then it should be:
script type=text/javascript src=templates.js/script
Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melchior FRANZ
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:58 PM
To: flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Web
Ben Morrison wrote:
Well then it should be:
script type=text/javascript src=templates.js/script
Not really, the validator is ignoring a meta tag in the header which has
been around since 1997 that describes that *every* script in the page
should be treated as text/javascript.
Erik
Erik Hofman wrote:
Not really, the validator is ignoring a meta tag in the header which has
been around since 1997 that describes that *every* script in the page
should be treated as text/javascript.
Actually not. Curtis forgot to add the following line to the header
section of the page:
meta
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 12 May 2005 23:08:
I'm happy to take web page patches in the future ...
OK. At the very same day that fgfs (the simulator) becomes bugfree,
I'll start to send patches for the website. Priorities ... :-P
m.
___
