RE: [Flightgear-devel] New keybinding
David Megginson I've bound Ctrl-R to the radios dialog. I imagine that this will be a very frequently-used command, especially for aircraft that do not have fully-interactive radios yet. All the best, Is that hard coded? I was literally in the process of binding R/r for seat raise/lower. Rather sounds like I'd better use L/l. Regards Vivian Meazza ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] New keybinding
Vivian Meazza wrote: I've bound Ctrl-R to the radios dialog. I imagine that this will be a very frequently-used command, especially for aircraft that do not have fully-interactive radios yet. Is that hard coded? I was literally in the process of binding R/r for seat raise/lower. Rather sounds like I'd better use L/l. That's *control* R. I'm not sure if r/R are in use. All the best, David ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
RE: [Flightgear-devel] New keybinding
David Megginson wrote Sent: 11 March 2004 16:05 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] New keybinding Vivian Meazza wrote: I've bound Ctrl-R to the radios dialog. I imagine that this will be a very frequently-used command, especially for aircraft that do not have fully-interactive radios yet. Is that hard coded? I was literally in the process of binding R/r for seat raise/lower. Rather sounds like I'd better use L/l. That's *control* R. I'm not sure if r/R are in use. Yes, understand that - I didn't want to mix contexts up - CTRL R R/r = raise seat and radios. Not too easy to remember, and you might want to use R/r for other radio stuff. No problem, I'll use L/l Regards Vivian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
